April 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Apr 1 00:30:01 EDT 2003
Ending: Wed Apr 30 22:19:22 EDT 2003
Messages: 153

• [FOM] Scope questions   Mícheál Mac an Airchinnigh
• [FOM] natural language and the Fof M: the main pt.   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] Re: natural language and the F of M   Peter Apostoli
• [FOM] book announcement: On Brouwer   Markus Van Atten
• [FOM] Floyd, Putnam, Wittgenstein   Timothy Bays
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   James Robert Brown
• [FOM] Consistency and Completeness in Natural Language   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Why Mathematics needs verbs   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Quote from Russell   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Natural Language and Mathematics (reply to Harvey)   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Mass and count terms   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Wittgenstein   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Irrational numbers   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Wittgenstein   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Mathematical vs Logical Finitism   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   Michael Lamport Commons
• [FOM] Is anyone on this list an expert on Conjoint Measure a la Luce?   Michael Lamport Commons
• [FOM] Book notice from the authors   Martin Davis
• [FOM] announcement   Martin Davis
• [FOM] mathematics and ordinary language   Martin Davis
• [FOM] CONFERENCE ON ALGEBRAIC AND TOPOLOGICAL METHODS IN NON-CLASSICAL LOGICS   Martin Davis
• [FOM] Re: FTGI1:Classical Propositional Calculus   Martin Davis
• [FOM] the moderator takes a trip   Martin Davis
• [FOM] conference on fine structure   Martin Davis
• [FOM] Searching the FOM archive using Google   Martin Davis
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   H. Enderton
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Bill Everdell)   Everdell at aol.com
• [FOM] FOM posting-Wittgenstein?   Juliet Floyd
• [FOM] Re: consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Re: Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Re: Wittgenstein?   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Re: FOM posting-Wittgenstein?   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] On AE...EA...A   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Why Mathematics needs verbs   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Lucas Wiman)   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] natural language and the Fof M   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Natural Language and Mathematics (reply to Harvey)   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Re: natural language and the F of M   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] 163:Ouch!   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] FTGI1:Classical Propositional Calculus   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Scope questions   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] 164:Foundations with (almost) no axioms   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Wittgenstein   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Difficult?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Bucknerism = Finitism?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] FOM posting-Wittgenstein?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] 165:Incompleteness Reformulated   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Godel's Theorems   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Natural Language and Mathematics (reply to Harvey)   Richard G Heck
• [FOM] Mass and count terms   Richard G Heck
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Some logics of "True(x)" compared   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Some logics of "True(x)" compared   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] RE: FOM FTGI Boolean Lattices   Matt Insall
• [FOM] RE: FOM FTGI Boolean Lattices   Matt Insall
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   Akihiro Kanamori
• [FOM] Godel's Theorems   Kanovei
• [FOM] 164: Foundations with (almost) no axioms   Vladik Kreinovich
• [FOM] David Corfield's new book on "Real Mathematics"   Martin Krieger
• [FOM] Godel's Theorems   Giuseppe Longo
• [FOM] Modal logics of contingency   Joao Marcos
• [FOM] housing for June ASL Meeting   Dave Marker
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Akihiro Kanamori)   Colin McLarty
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Lucas Wiman)   Colin McLarty
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Lucas Wiman)   Colin McLarty
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare (Friedman and Everdell)   Colin McLarty
• [FOM] Predicativity   Steve Newberry
• [FOM] Modal logics of contingency   Åke Persson
• [FOM] Scope questions   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] Founding math on points and lines [was: Irrational numbers]   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] RE: FOM FTGI Boolean Lattices   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] RE: FOM FTGI Boolean Lattices   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] Re: FOM Digest, Vol 4, Issue 33   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] Difficult?   Rahul Santhanam
• [FOM] mathematics and ordinary language   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] RE: FOM FTGI Boolean Lattices   Randall R Schulz
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Consistency and completeness in natural language   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] natural language and the Fof M   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] natural language and the F of M   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] natural language and the F of M   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] natural language and the F of M   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] category mistakes   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] real numbers   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Mark Steiner
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Mark Steiner
• [FOM] FOM posting-Wittgenstein?   Mark Steiner
• [FOM] FTGI1:CPC & 'Ordinary Language'   Sean C Stidd
• [FOM] FTGI1:Classical Propositional Calculus   Sean C Stidd
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   William Tait
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   William Tait
• [FOM] Predicativity   William Tait
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] consistency and completeness in natural language   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare (correction)   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] FTGI1:Classical Propositional Calculus   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Stone's representation theorem   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   T P Uschanov
• [FOM] natural language and the F of M   Robert Williams
• [FOM] Papers of Poincare   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Akihiro Kanamori)   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Re: Papers of Poincare (Lucas Wiman)   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Mathematics and Explanations   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] 164: Foundations with (almost) no axioms   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Real numbers   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Difficult?   Lucas Wiman
• [FOM] Wittgenstein   Alexander Zenkin
• [FOM] Wittgenstein and FOM   mjmurphy
• [FOM] Fw: Wittgenstein,Putnam, Floyd, Godel   mjmurphy
• [FOM] FTGI Powerset [Boolean] Lattices   steve newberry
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi
• [FOM] Godel's Theorems   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi
• [FOM] Wittgenstein?   sean.stidd at juno.com
• [FOM] Reply to Franzen, Heck, Davis   charles silver
• [FOM] Paolo Mancosu's monograph on 17th century mathematics   wwtx at earthlink.net

Last message date: Wed Apr 30 22:19:22 EDT 2003
Archived on: Fri Mar 11 12:50:01 EDT 2005

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...