[FOM] Wittgenstein?
William Tait
wwtx at earthlink.net
Tue Apr 22 19:07:27 EDT 2003
On Tuesday, April 22, 2003, at 03:11 PM, sean.stidd at juno.com wrote:
> It is a common myth that Wittgenstein invented the truth-tables, but
> this is not so: one can find them in Frege. Wittgenstein himself
> specifically disavows any claim to having invented them in the
> Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cora Diamond, ed. (at work
> now so don't have the page number handy).
Page 177, where he attributes the truth tables to Frege..
> That said I do not dispute at all the claim that W's contributions to
> the philosophy of logic were (and IMO remain) very important. He just
> didn't invent the truth tables. What was original to W was his use of
> the truth tables to elucidate a combinatoric conception of the
> propositional connectives.
LW's thesis in the Tractatus is that every proposition is a
truth-function of independent elementary propositions and that a
logical or mathematical truth is a tautology. Even if we ignore the
question of independence, this restricts mathematics to predicative
mathematics, since, e.g., even second-order impredicative arithmetical
propositions cannot in general be understood as truth functions of
atomic arithmetical propositions.
If we add the independence condition, then the only domains of
discourse possible consists essentially of sets of independent tosses
of coins. What real domains of discourse can be understood in such
terms?
It is in its mad way a beautiful book, and I can sympathize with people
who try to make a coherent sense of it. But until someone can explain
his notion of object and of elementary proposition as a certain kind of
concatenation of objects, in a way that fits the rest of the text, the
basic doctrine of the book remains obscure.
In any case, let me provoke: I would say that the Tractatus had no role
whatsoever in the subsequent development of logic or mathematics.
Bill Tait
More information about the FOM
mailing list