February 2013 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Feb 1 13:08:48 EST 2013
Ending: Thu Feb 28 19:29:31 EST 2013
Messages: 105

• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH (corrected version)   joeshipman at aol.com
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Sam Sanders
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   joeshipman at aol.com
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] 2nd Call for papers: Machines, Computations and Universality 2013   Turlough Neary
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Nik Weaver
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Sam Sanders
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH (corrected version)   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] how would a physicist know that we are not living in a Skolem hull?   Paul Elliott
• [FOM] [LICS] LICS Newsletter 143   Andrzej Murawski
• [FOM] how would a physicist know that we are not living in a Skolem hull?   Nik Weaver
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] how would a physicist know that we are not living in a Skolem hull?   meskew at math.uci.edu
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   joeshipman at aol.com
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Nik Weaver
• [FOM] 2nd Call for Papers ESSLLI 2013 STUDENT SESSION   gprimiero at libero.it
• [FOM] Extramathematical notions and CH   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Sam Sanders
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] lambda calculus/Barendregt   pax0 at seznam.cz
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] how would a physicist know that we are not living in a Skolem hull?   Dmytro Taranovsky
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Jaykov Foukzon
• [FOM] extramathematical notions and the CH   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] how would a physicist know that we are not living in a Skolem hull?   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] Reverse Concept Calculus   Zuhair Abdul Ghafoor Al-Johar
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Robert Solovay
• [FOM] CfP: HaPoC 2013, 28-31 October, ENS, Paris   gprimiero at libero.it
• [FOM] CADE-24 Workshops   Geoff Sutcliffe by way of Martin Davis <martin at eipye.com>
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Monroe Eskew
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] for LICS newsletter   Leonid Libkin
• [FOM] Mendelson's missing appendix on the consistency of PA   Peter Smith
• [FOM] XIV Graduate Student Conference in Logic (GSCL)   Andrew Arana
• [FOM] : Questions on Cantor   Christopher Menzel
• [FOM] Mendelson's missing appendix on the consistency of PA   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] CiE Newsletter No.66, February 13, 2013   Olivier Bournez
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Robert Solovay
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Robert Solovay
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] 2nd CFP: SYMPOSIUM on PROOFS, PROGRAMS, PROCEDURES: FORMAL AND EPISTEMIC ISSUES @ CLPS13   gprimiero at libero.it
• [FOM] Reminder: Talk @CLPS-UGent: Hannes Leitgeb ( Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy)   gprimiero at libero.it
• [FOM] Mendelson's missing appendix on the consistency of PA   Peter Smith
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models (Joe Shipman)   Jaykov Foukzon
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Monroe Eskew
• [FOM] CFP: Ninth Panhellenic Logic Symposium   Nikolaos S. Papaspyrou
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   meskew at math.uci.edu
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] Pre-implication algebras   A. Mani
• [FOM] 2nd CfP: Conference on Logic and Philosophy of Science - CLPS13   gprimiero at libero.it
• [FOM] Problems and prospects in the philosophy of mathematics: Illinois, October 2013   Andrew Arana
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Kreinovich, Vladik
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Arnold Neumaier
• [FOM] Postgraduate Studies in Logic, History and Philosophy of Science, UGent   PGS_LHPS
• [FOM] A reformulation of Morse-Kelley's class theory.   Zuhair Abdul Ghafoor Al-Johar
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Nik Weaver
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models (Joe Shipman)   Jaykov Foukzon
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Vaughan Pratt
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Jaykov Foukzon
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Colin McLarty
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Jay Sulzberger
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Monroe Eskew
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Monroe Eskew
• [FOM] FOM Digest, Vol 122, Issue 12 Re: A proo f that ZFC has no any omega-models (Aatu Koskensilta )   Jaykov Foukzon
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Arnold Neumaier
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Jay Sulzberger
• [FOM] LATA 2013: call for participation   URV - RESEARCH GROUP ON MATHEMATICAL LINGUISTICS
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   W.Taylor at math.canterbury.ac.nz
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Keith Brian Johnson
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Nik Weaver
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Arnold Neumaier
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Arnold Neumaier
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   joeshipman at aol.com
• [FOM] Should mathematicians be explicit about what they are assuming?   Martin Davis
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Arnold Neumaier
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Colin McLarty
• [FOM] Should mathematicians be explicit about what they are assuming?   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Sam Sanders
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Jay Sulzberger
• [FOM] A proof that ZFC has no any omega-models   Monroe Eskew
• [FOM] 2nd CfP: Gödel conference (Aix-en-Provence, July 11-13, 2013)   Mark van Atten
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Joe Shipman
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] CfP: Fifth French PhilMath Workshop (FPMW 5), Oct 17-19, Clermont-Ferrand   Mark van Atten
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Kreinovich, Vladik
• [FOM] Question about theoretical physics   Timothy Y. Chow

Last message date: Thu Feb 28 19:29:31 EST 2013
Archived on: Fri Mar 1 00:38:32 EST 2013

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...