September 2003 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Sep 1 04:02:03 EDT 2003
Ending: Tue Sep 30 23:49:35 EDT 2003
Messages: 148

• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Robin Adams
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Arnon Avron
• [FOM] Self-referentiality and Godel sentences   Arnon Avron
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (a reply to Podnieks)   Arnon Avron
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Plural quantification and set theory   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Foundations/Philosophy   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Dean Buckner
• [FOM] Proof-theoretic strength of relativizable arguments in computational complexity   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Re: Proof theoretic strength of relativisable arguments in computational complexity   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Nash, Impagliazzo, and Remmel paper   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Timothy Y. Chow
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   David Corfield
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   David Corfield
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   David Corfield
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   David Corfield
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   David Corfield
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   David Corfield
• [FOM] announcements   Martin Davis
• [FOM] the "gap" is over   Martin Davis
• [FOM] variants of email addresses   Martin Davis
• [FOM] Jonsson and Rowbottom Cardinals   E. Todd Eisworth
• [FOM] P = NP & complexity   Thomas Forster
• [FOM] Re: numbers and sets   Thomas Forster
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Self-referentiality and Godel sentences   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (a reply to Podnieks)   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Re: Platonism and Formalism (a reply to Podnieks)   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Torkel Franzen
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Self-referentiality and Godel sentences   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Foundations/Philosophy   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Golden Age?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] 189:Some Model theoretic Pi-0-1 statements   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Contrasting methodologies   Harvey Friedman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Haim Gaifman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Haim Gaifman
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism and mixtures thereof   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Re: numbers and sets   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] 23.99 Carat Gold   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Re: numbers and sets   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Coherentism, pt. 1   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Coherentism, pt. 2   A.P. Hazen
• [FOM] Axiomatic Syntax   Richard Heck
• [FOM] A question for Recursion Theorists   Jeff Hirst
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Sandy Hodges
• [FOM] which sets numbers can be   M. Randall Holmes
• [FOM] squaring a set   M. Randall Holmes
• [FOM] what numbers can be   Randall Holmes
• [FOM] numbers are an abstract data type   Randall Holmes
• [FOM] Slater's recent comments   Randall Holmes
• [FOM] Slater's position   Randall Holmes
• [FOM] higher order logic, Slater   Randall Holmes
• [FOM] Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity   JoeShipman at aol.com
• [FOM] Re: numbers and sets   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity?   Aatu Koskensilta
• [FOM] call for abstracts -- 2004 spring asl meeting   Michael Kremer
• [FOM] Weil's Rosetta Stone--translated into English   Martin Krieger
• [FOM] Golden Age?   Alexander M Lemberg
• [FOM] in the news   Dave Marker
• [FOM] Plural quantification and set theory   Tom McKay
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   P.T.M.Rood at ph.vu.nl
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   P.T.M.Rood at ph.vu.nl
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Charles Parsons
• [FOM] foundations of quasi-empiricism   Patrick Peccatte
• [FOM] Two level foundations?   Karlis Podnieks
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Karlis Podnieks
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Karlis Podnieks
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (a reply to Avron and Franzen)   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (answers to Sandy Hodges and Haim Gaifman)   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (answer to Steve Newberry)   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actualinfinity?   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential andactual infinity?   Vladimir Sazonov
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] Golden Age?   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Stephen G Simpson
• [FOM] numbers and sets (again)   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Foundations/Philosophy   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] what numbers can be   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] numbers and sets   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] numbers and sets   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Slater's recent comments   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Slater's position   Hartley Slater
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Robert M. Solovay
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Robert M. Solovay
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (fwd)   Robert M. Solovay
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   John Steel
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   John Steel
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   John Steel
• [FOM] Re: numbers and sets   Eric Steinhart
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Charles A Stewart
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Charles A Stewart
• [FOM] On Platonism and Formalism   Dmytro Taranovsky
• [FOM] Position at OSU   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Neil Tennant
• [FOM] Proof theoretic strength of relativisable arguments in computational complexity   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] P=NP and complexity   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Goedel on Wittgenstein again   Alasdair Urquhart
• [FOM] Re: Platonism and Formalism (a reply to Podnieks)   T P Uschanov
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   Jon Williamson
• [FOM] Platonism and Formalism (a reply to Podnieks)   Todd Wilson
• [FOM] CAT co-well-powered?   Todd Wilson
• [FOM] Simpson on Tymoczkoism   Richard Zach
• [FOM] Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actualinfinity?   Alexander Zenkin
• [FOM] CAT co-well-powered?   HAUCOURT emmanuel
• [FOM] Re: Sharp mathematical distinction between potential and actual infinity? + Re: John Baez on David Corfield's book   tom holden
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   jbaldwin at math.uic.edu
• [FOM] A question for Recursion Theorists   mail at sakharov.net
• [FOM] the gap   martin at eipye.com
• [FOM] CAT co-well-powered?   mhebert
• [FOM] John Baez on David Corfield's book   mjmurphy
• [FOM] Nonstandard Analysis Session at AMS meeting this January - last call   montez at fidnet.com
• [FOM] A question for Recursion Theorists   steve newberry
• [FOM] quasi-empiricism and anti-foundationalism   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi
• [FOM] Foundationalism   praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi

Last message date: Tue Sep 30 23:49:35 EDT 2003
Archived on: Fri Mar 11 12:50:21 EDT 2005

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...