[FOM] 596: Finite Continuation Theory 15/perfect?
Harvey Friedman
hmflogic at gmail.com
Sat Aug 8 00:35:44 EDT 2015
The explicitly finite statements presented since I started to put
"perfect?" on the subject header, are not done correctly - i.e.,
WRONG. However, there are shades of truth hidden there.
We will recover here with new explicitly Pi01 statements.
Let's recap the implicitly Pi01 statements, including the ones in the
last posting.
PROPOSITION A. Every finite subset of Q^k|>n has a maximal nonnegative
continuation, where S[1,...,n]|>n = S[0,...,n-1]|>n.
More generally,
PROPOSITION B. Every finite subset of Q^k|>n has a maximal nonnegative
r-continuation, where S[1,...,n]|>n = S[0,...,n-1]|>n.
Yet more generally,
PROPOSITION C. Every finite length tower of finite subsets of Q^k|>n
has a maximal nonnegative r-continuation tower, where each set
satisfies S[1,...,n]|>n = S[0,...,n-1]|>n.
Note that we are now using S[1,...,n] instead of S_1...n, for the
projection at 1,...,n. This is convenient, if we ever project at more
complicated numbers than 1,...,n and 0,...,n-1.
Now we start over again with the explicitly finite statements. We head
directly into initial segments of the nonnegative integers, N.
We use four kinds of COMPLEMENTS of S containedin {0,...,t}^k.
DEFINITION 1. Let S containedin {0,...,t}^k. S|<x = {y in S: max(y) <
max(x)}. S|<=x = {y in S: max(y) <= max(x)}. C(S) = {x in {0,...,t}^k:
x notin S}. C'(S) = {x in {0,...,t}^k: S union {x} is not a
continuation of S}. C''(S) = {x in {0,...,t}^k: S|<=x union {x} is not
a continuation of S|<=x}. C'''(S) = {x in {0,...,t}^k: S|<x union {x}
is not a continuation of S|<x}.
Let S be a continuation of A containedin {0,...,t}^k in {0,...,t}^k.
Obviously S is a maximal continuation of A containedin {0,...,t}^k in
{0,...,t}^k if and only if C(S) = C'(S). However, C(S) = C''(S) and
C(S) = C'''(S) are stronger conditions on S. Nevertheless, even C(S) =
C'(S) is too strong a condition to be usable for us in this finite
context.
We now introduce a combinatorial relation between subsets of {0,...,t}^k.
DEFINITION 2. Let A,B containedin {0,...,t}^k. A,B are similar below p
if and only if every x in A union B is order equivalent to some y in A
and z in B, where y,z have the same coordinates < p in the same
positions.
PROPOSITION 1. For all t > (8k)!, every subset of {0,...,k!}^k has a
continuation in {0,...,kt}^k, where S^2 x C(S) x {(2t,3t,...,kt)} and
S^2 x C'(S) x {(t,2t,...,(k-1)t)} are similar below t.
PROPOSITION 2. For all t > (8k)!, every subset of {0,...,k!}^k has a
continuation in {0,...,kt}^k, where S^2 x C(S) x {(2t,3t,...,kt)} and
S^2 x C''(S) x {(t,2t,...,(k-1)t)} are similar below t.
PROPOSITION 3. For all t > (8k)!, every subset of {0,...,k!}^k has a
continuation in {0,...,kt}^k, where S^2 x C(S) x {(2t,3t,...,kt)} and
S^2 x C'''(S) x {(t,2t,...,(k-1)t)} are similar below t.
Propositions 1-3 are explicitly Pi01.
THEOREM 4. Propositions 1-3 are provably equivalent to Con(SRP) over EFA.
************************************************************
My website is at https://u.osu.edu/friedman.8/ and my youtube site is at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdRdeExwKiWndBl4YOxBTEQ
This is the 596th in a series of self contained numbered
postings to FOM covering a wide range of topics in f.o.m. The list of
previous numbered postings #1-527 can be found at the FOM posting
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2014-August/018092.html
528: More Perfect Pi01 8/16/14 5:19AM
529: Yet more Perfect Pi01 8/18/14 5:50AM
530: Friendlier Perfect Pi01
531: General Theory/Perfect Pi01 8/22/14 5:16PM
532: More General Theory/Perfect Pi01 8/23/14 7:32AM
533: Progress - General Theory/Perfect Pi01 8/25/14 1:17AM
534: Perfect Explicitly Pi01 8/27/14 10:40AM
535: Updated Perfect Explicitly Pi01 8/30/14 2:39PM
536: Pi01 Progress 9/1/14 11:31AM
537: Pi01/Flat Pics/Testing 9/6/14 12:49AM
538: Progress Pi01 9/6/14 11:31PM
539: Absolute Perfect Naturalness 9/7/14 9:00PM
540: SRM/Comparability 9/8/14 12:03AM
541: Master Templates 9/9/14 12:41AM
542: Templates/LC shadow 9/10/14 12:44AM
543: New Explicitly Pi01 9/10/14 11:17PM
544: Initial Maximality/HUGE 9/12/14 8:07PM
545: Set Theoretic Consistency/SRM/SRP 9/14/14 10:06PM
546: New Pi01/solving CH 9/26/14 12:05AM
547: Conservative Growth - Triples 9/29/14 11:34PM
548: New Explicitly Pi01 10/4/14 8:45PM
549: Conservative Growth - beyond triples 10/6/14 1:31AM
550: Foundational Methodology 1/Maximality 10/17/14 5:43AM
551: Foundational Methodology 2/Maximality 10/19/14 3:06AM
552: Foundational Methodology 3/Maximality 10/21/14 9:59AM
553: Foundational Methodology 4/Maximality 10/21/14 11:57AM
554: Foundational Methodology 5/Maximality 10/26/14 3:17AM
555: Foundational Methodology 6/Maximality 10/29/14 12:32PM
556: Flat Foundations 1 10/29/14 4:07PM
557: New Pi01 10/30/14 2:05PM
558: New Pi01/more 10/31/14 10:01PM
559: Foundational Methodology 7/Maximality 11/214 10:35PM
560: New Pi01/better 11/314 7:45PM
561: New Pi01/HUGE 11/5/14 3:34PM
562: Perfectly Natural Review #1 11/19/14 7:40PM
563: Perfectly Natural Review #2 11/22/14 4:56PM
564: Perfectly Natural Review #3 11/24/14 1:19AM
565: Perfectly Natural Review #4 12/25/14 6:29PM
566: Bridge/Chess/Ultrafinitism 12/25/14 10:46AM
567: Counting Equivalence Classes 1/2/15 10:38AM
568: Counting Equivalence Classes #2 1/5/15 5:06AM
569: Finite Integer Sums and Incompleteness 1/515 8:04PM
570: Philosophy of Incompleteness 1 1/8/15 2:58AM
571: Philosophy of Incompleteness 2 1/8/15 11:30AM
572: Philosophy of Incompleteness 3 1/12/15 6:29PM
573: Philosophy of Incompleteness 4 1/17/15 1:44PM
574: Characterization Theory 1 1/17/15 1:44AM
575: Finite Games and Incompleteness 1/23/15 10:42AM
576: Game Correction/Simplicity Theory 1/27/15 10:39 AM
577: New Pi01 Incompleteness 3/7/15 2:54PM
578: Provably Falsifiable Propositions 3/7/15 2:54PM
579: Impossible Counting 5/26/15 8:58PM
580: Goedel's Second Revisited 5/29/15 5:52 AM
581: Impossible Counting/more 6/2/15 5:55AM
582: Link+Continuation Theory 1 6/21/15 5:38PM
583: Continuation Theory 2 6/23/15 12:01PM
584: Finite Continuation Theory 3 6/26/15 7:51PM
585: Finite Continuation Theory 4 6/29/15 11:23PM
586: Finite Continuation Theory 5 6/20/15 1:32PM
587: Finite Continuation Theory 6 7/1/15 11:39PM
588: Finite Continuation Theory 7 7/2/15 2:44PM
589: Finite Continuation Theory 8 7/4/15 6:51PM
590: Finite Continuation Theory 9 7/6/15 5:20PM
591: Finite Continuation Theory 10 7/12/15 3:38PM
592: Finite Continuation Theory 11/perfect? 7/29/15 4:30PM
593: Finite Continuation Theory 12/perfect? 8/23/15 9:47PM
594: Finite Continuation Theory 13/perfect? 8/4/15 1:44PM
595: Finite Continuation Theory 14/perfect? 8/5/15 8:23PM
Harvey Friedman
More information about the FOM
mailing list