[FOM] Inconsistency of P
Daniel Mehkeri
dmehkeri at gmail.com
Mon Oct 3 22:44:16 EDT 2011
> I am reasonably aware of Nelson on this, but my main point is that
> mathematicians (including Nelson, by the way) seem to regularly use -
> and teach - facts which logically imply the consistency of at least
> significant fragments of PA, including PRA, or single quantifier PA.
> At least, the former Nelson - and what about Nelson's current math
> teaching?
"No one has actively tried to prevent me from doing constructive
mathematics. On the other hand, I don't think I could get away for long
teaching the required introductory analysis course from a constructive
point of view."
-- Fred Richman, _Interview with a constructive mathematician_
Students, Bolzano-Weierstrass is invalid, you see there are sequences of
rationals in [0,1] with no convergent subsequence, called Specker
sequences ...
More information about the FOM
mailing list