[FOM] Neutrosophic Mathematics!?

[A. Mani]

'Neutrosophic Mathematics, philosophy, logic and whatnot' is junk.

Example:  
Preface in http://arxiv.org/pdf/math.GM/0306384
should be sufficient.

Interesting links: 
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/FlorentinSmarandache.html

I think that much of the theory is nonsensical and betrays lack of 
understanding of other known logics. Some authors may have used the term in 
ignorance, but there are OTHERS who have done so with the intent to bring all 
that into the mainstream. That is probably the main reason for this post.

Results of an applied nature in the field are often rewritten versions of 
known results in fuzzy mathematics or Operations research or related fields. 
The concept of 'neutrosophic set', for example, is a particular case of 
lattice valued fuzzy set (investigated since 1967). It may also be seen as a 
particular case of a rough fuzzy set (Dubois et al '90).    

Here is a link to the repository/junk yard: 
http://fs.gallup.unm.edu//ebooks-otherformats.htm
(http://fs.gallup.unm.edu//MultispaceMultistructure.pdf  !?! )


Best

A. Mani


-- 
A. Mani
ASL, CLC,  AMS, CMS
http://www.logicamani.co.cc