[FOM] Neutrosophic Mathematics!?
A. Mani
a_mani_sc_gs at yahoo.co.in
Tue May 25 21:22:04 EDT 2010
'Neutrosophic Mathematics, philosophy, logic and whatnot' is junk.
Example:
Preface in http://arxiv.org/pdf/math.GM/0306384
should be sufficient.
Interesting links:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/FlorentinSmarandache.html
I think that much of the theory is nonsensical and betrays lack of
understanding of other known logics. Some authors may have used the term in
ignorance, but there are OTHERS who have done so with the intent to bring all
that into the mainstream. That is probably the main reason for this post.
Results of an applied nature in the field are often rewritten versions of
known results in fuzzy mathematics or Operations research or related fields.
The concept of 'neutrosophic set', for example, is a particular case of
lattice valued fuzzy set (investigated since 1967). It may also be seen as a
particular case of a rough fuzzy set (Dubois et al '90).
Here is a link to the repository/junk yard:
http://fs.gallup.unm.edu//ebooks-otherformats.htm
(http://fs.gallup.unm.edu//MultispaceMultistructure.pdf !?! )
Best
A. Mani
--
A. Mani
ASL, CLC, AMS, CMS
http://www.logicamani.co.cc
More information about the FOM
mailing list