Start Lecture #20
This is terrible!
Why?
Ans: All but the last frame are frozen once loaded so you can
replace only one frame.
This is especially bad after a phase shift in the program as now the
program is references mostly new pages but only one frame is
available to hold them.
When a page fault occurs, choose as victim that page that has been unused for the longest time, i.e. the one that has been least recently used.
LRU is definitely
Homework: 28, 22.
A clever hardware method to determine the LRU page.
Keep a count of how frequently each page is used and evict the one that has been the lowest score. Specifically:
R | counter |
---|---|
1 | 10000000 |
0 | 01000000 |
1 | 10100000 |
1 | 11010000 |
0 | 01101000 |
0 | 00110100 |
1 | 10011010 |
1 | 11001101 |
0 | 01100110 |
NFU doesn't distinguish between old references and recent ones. The following modification does distinguish.
Aging does indeed give more weight to later references, but an n bit counter maintains data for only n time intervals; whereas NFU maintains data for at least 2n intervals.
Homework: 24, 33.
The goals are first to specify which pages a given process needs to have memory resident in order for the process to run without too many page faults and second to ensure that these pages are indeed resident.
But this is impossible since it requires predicting the future. So we again make the assumption that the near future is well approximated by the immediate past.
We measure time in units of memory references, so t=1045 means the time when the 1045th memory reference is issued. In fact we measure time separately for each process, so t=1045 really means the time when this process made its 1045th memory reference.
Definition: w(k,t), the working set at time t (with window k) is the set of pages referenced by the last k memory references ending at reference t.
The idea of the working set policy is to ensure that each process keeps its working set in memory.
Homework: Describe a process (i.e., a program) that runs for a long time (say hours) and always has a working set size less than 10. Assume k=100,000 and the page size is 4KB. The program need not be practical or useful.
Homework: Describe a process that runs for a long time and (except for the very beginning of execution) always has a working set size greater than 1000. Again assume k=100,000 and the page size is 4KB. The program need not be practical or useful.
The definition of Working Set is local to a process. That is, each process has a working set; there is no system wide working set other than the union of all the working sets of each process.
However, the working set of a single process has effects on the demand paging behavior and victim selection of other processes. If a process's working set is growing in size, i.e., w(t,k) is increasing as t increases, then we need to obtain new frames from other processes. A process with a working set decreasing in size is a source of free frames. We will see below that this is an interesting amalgam of local and global replacement policies.
Interesting questions concerning the working set include:
... Various approximations to the working set, have been devised. We will study two: Using virtual time instead of memory references (immediately below), and Page Fault Frequency (part of section 3.5.1). In 3.4.9 we will see the popular WSClock algorithm that includes an approximation of the working set as well as several other ideas.
Instead of counting memory referenced and declaring a page in the working set if it was used within k references, we keep track of time, which the system does anyway, and declare a page in the working set if it was used in the past τ seconds. Note that the time is measured only while this process is running, i.e., we are using virtual time.
time of last useto the PTE. The procedure for setting this field is in item 3 below.
This is too good and important to skip, but too detailed to remember. Thus it is not grayed out, but I won't ask detailed questions about it on the final.
The WSClock algorithm combines aspects of the working set algorithm and the clock implementation of second chance.
Like clock we create a circular list of nodes with a hand
pointing to the next node to examine.
There is one such node for every resident page of this process; thus
the nodes can be thought of as a list of frames or a kind of
inverted page table.
Like working set we store in each node the referenced and modified bits R and M and the time of last use. R and M are cleared when the page is read in. R is set by the hardware on a reference and cleared periodically by the OS (perhaps at the end of each page fault or perhaps every m milliseconds). M is set by the hardware on a write. We indicate below the setting of the time of last use and the clearing of M.
As with working set, we use virtual time and declare a page old if its last reference is more than τ seconds in the past. Other pages are declared young (i.e., in the working set).
As with clock, on every page fault a victim is found by scanning the list starting with the node indicated by the clock hand.
It is possible to go all around the clock without finding a victim. In that case
An alternative treatment of WSClock, including more details of its interaction with the I/O subsystem, can be found here.
Algorithm | Comment |
---|---|
Random | Poor, used for comparison |
Optimal | Unimplementable, used for comparison |
NRU | Crude |
FIFO | Not good ignores frequency of use |
Second Chance | Improvement over FIFO |
Clock | Better implementation of Second Chance |
LIFO | Horrible, useless |
LRU | Great but impractical |
NFU | Crude LRU approximation |
Aging | Better LRU approximation |
Working Set | Good, but expensive |
WSClock | Good approximation to working set |