Chapter 1: Introduction

Homework: Read Chapter 1 (Introduction)

Levels of abstraction (virtual machines)

• Software (and hardware, but that is not this course) is often implemented in layers.
• The higher layers use the facilities provided by lower layers.
• Alternatively said, the upper layers are written using a more powerful and more abstract virtual machine than the lower layers.
• Alternatively said, each layer is written as though it runs on the virtual machine supplied by the lower layer and in turn provides a more abstract (pleasent) virtual machine for the higher layer to run on.
• Using a broad brush, the layers are.
  1. Applications and utilities
  2. Compilers, Editors, Command Interpreter (shell, DOS prompt)
  3. Libraries
  4. The OS proper (the kernel, runs in privileged/kernel/supervisor mode)
  5. Hardware
• Compilers, editors, shell, loader. etc run in user mode.
• The kernel itself is itself normally layered, e.g.
  1. ...
  2. Filesystems
  3. Machine independent I/O
  4. Machine dependent device drivers
• The machine independent I/O part is written assuming ``virtual (i.e. idealized) hardware''. For example, the machine independent I/O portion simply reads a block from a ``disk''. But in reality one must deal with the specific disk controller.
• Often the machine independent part is more than one layer.
• The term OS is not well defined. Is it just the kernel? How about the libraries? The utilities? All these are certainly system software but not clear how much is part of the OS.

1.1: What is an operating system?

The kernel itself raises the level of abstraction and hides details. For example a user (of the kernel) can write to a file (a concept not present in hardware) and ignore whether the file resides on a floppy, a CD-ROM, or a hard magnetic disk

The kernel is a resource manager (so users don't conflict).

How is an OS fundamentally different from a compiler (say)?

Answer: Concurrency! Per Brinch Hansen in Operating Systems Principles (Prentice Hall, 1973) writes.

The main difficulty of multiprogramming is that concurrent activities can interact in a time-dependent manner, which makes it practically impossibly to locate programming errors by systematic testing. Perhaps, more than anything else, this explains the difficulty of making operating systems reliable.

1.2 History of Operating Systems

1. Single user (no OS).
   
   
2. Batch, uniprogrammed, run to completion.
   • The OS now must be protected from the user program so that it is capable of starting (and assisting) the next program in the batch).
   
   
3. Multiprogrammed
   • The purpose was to overlap CPU and I/O
   • Multiple batches
     • IBM OS/MFT (Multiprogramming with a Fixed number of Tasks)
       • OS for IBM system 360.
       • The (real) memory is partitioned and a batch is assigned to a fixed partition.
       • The memory assigned to a partition does not change.
       • Jobs were spooled from cards into the memory by a separate processor (an IBM 1401). Similarly output was spooled from the memory to a printer (I believe a 1403) by the 1401.
     • IBM OS/MVT (Multiprogramming with a Variable number of Tasks) (then other names)
       • Each job gets just the amount of memory it needs. That is, the partitioning of memory changes as jobs enter and leave
       • MVT is a more ``efficient'' user of resources but is more difficult.
       • When we study memory management, we will see that with varying size partitions questions like compaction and ``holes'' arise.
   • Time sharing
     • This is multiprogramming with rapid switching between jobs (processes). Deciding when to switch and which process to switch to is called scheduling.
     • We will study scheduling when we do processor management
   
   
4. Personal Computers
   • Serious PC Operating systems such as linux, Windows NT (2000) and (the newest) MacOS are multiprogrammed OSes.
   • GUIs have become important. Debate as to whether it should be part of the kernel.
   • Early PC operating systems were uniprogrammed and their direct descendants still are (e.g. Windows ME).

Homework: 3.

1.3: OS Zoo

There is not as much difference between mainframe, server, multiprocessor, and PC OSes as Tannenbaum suggests. For example Windows NT and 2000 are used in all (except mainframes) and Unix and Linux are used on all.

1.3.1: Mainframe Operating Systems

Used in data centers, these systems ofter tremendous I/O capabilities.

1.3.2: Server Operating Systems

Perhaps the most important servers today are web servers. Again I/O (and network) performance are critical.

1.3.3: Multiprocessor Operating systems

These existed almost from the beginning of the computer age, but now are not exotic.

1.3.4: PC Operating Systems (client machines)

Some OSes (e.g. Windows ME) are tailored for this application. One could also say they are restricted to this application.

1.3.5: Real-time Operating Systems

• Often are Embedded Systems.
• Soft vs hard real time. In the latter missing a deadline is a fatal error--sometimes literally.
• Very important commercially, but not covered much in this course.

1.3.6: Embedded Operating Systems

• The OS is ``part of'' the device. For example, PDAs, microwave ovens, cardiac monitors.
• Often are real-time systems.
• Very important commercially, but not covered much in this course.

1.3.7: Smart Card Operating Systems

Very limited in power (both meanings of the word).

Multiple computers

• Network OS: Make use of the multiple PCs/workstations on a LAN.
• Distributed OS: A ``seamless'' version of above.
• Not part of this course (but often in G22.2251).

1.4: Computer Hardware Review

Tannenbaum's treatment is very brief and superficial. Mine is even more so. The picture on the right is very simplified. For one thing, today separate buses are used to Memory and Video.

1.4.1: Processors

We will ignore processor concepts such as program counters and stack pointers. We will also ignore computer design issues such as pipelining and superscalar. We do, however, need the notion of a trap, that is an instruction that atomically switches the processor into privileged mode and jumps to a pre-defined physical address.

1.4.2: Memory

We will ignore caches, but will (later) discuss demand paging, which is very similar although uses completely disjoint terminology. In both cases, the goal is to combine large slow memory with small fast memory and achieve the effect of large fast memory.

The central memory in a system is called RAM (Random Access Memory). A key point is that it is volatile, i.e. the memory loses its value if power is turned off.

Disk Hardware

I don't understand why Tanenbaum discusses disks here instead of in the next section entitled I/O devices, but he does. I don't.

ROM / PROM / EPROM / EEPROM / Flash Ram

ROM (Read Only Memory) is used to hold data that will not change, e.g. the serial number of a computer or the program use in a microwave. ROM is non-volatile.

But often this unchangable data needs to be changed (e.g., to fix bug). This gives rise first to PROM (Programmable ROM), which, like a CD-R, can be written once (as opposed to being mass produced already written like a CD-ROM), and then to EPROM (Erasable PROM; not Erasable ROM as in Tanenbaum), which is like a CD-RW. An EPROM is especially. convenient if it can be erased with a normal circuit (EEPROM, Electrically EPROM or Flash RAM).

Memory Protection and Context Switching

As mentioned above when discussing OS/MFT and OS/MVT multiprograming requires that we protect one process from another. That is we need to translate the virtual addresses of each program into distinct physical addresses. The hardware that performs this translation is called the MMU or Memory Management Unit.

When context switching from one process to another, the translation must change, which can be an expensive operation.