"Noisy Newton" Models

1. Battaglia PW, Hamrick JB, Tenenbaum JB (2013). Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (45), 18327-18332.
2. Gerstenberg, T. and Goodman, N.D. Ping Pong in Church: Productive use of Concepts in Human Probabilistic Inference Cog. Sci. 2012.
3. Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, N.D., Langado, D.A. and Tenenbaum, J.B. Noisy Newtons: Unifying process and dependency accounts of causal attribution. Cog. Sci. 2012, 378-383.
4. Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, N.D., Langado, D.A. and Tenenbaum, J.B. From counterfactual simulation to causal judgment, Cog. Sci. 2014.
5. Sanborn, A. N. (2014). Testing Bayesian and heuristic predictions of mass judgments of colliding objects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(938), 1-7
6. Sanborn, A. N., Mansinghka, V. K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2013). Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. Psychological Review, 120, 411-437,
7. Smith, Battaglia, and Vul Consistent physics underlying ballistic motion prediction Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2013)
8. Smith, Dechter, Tenenbaum, and Vul Physical predictions over time Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2013)
9. Smith and Vul, Looking forwards and backwards: Similarities and differences in prediction and retrodiction Cog. Sci. 2014.
10. Smith and Vul Sources of Uncertainty in Intuitive Physics Topics in Cognitive Science (2013)
11. Teglas, Vul, Girotto, Gonzalez, Tenenbaum, and Bonatti Pure reasoning in 12-month-olds as probabilistic inference. Science, 2011.