[SMT-LIB] QF_BV and division by zero
François Bobot
francois.bobot at cea.fr
Thu Mar 30 05:03:20 EDT 2017
Le 30/03/2017 à 05:52, Trevor Hansen a écrit :
> It'd be great to have QF_BV division and remainder by zero resolved in time for this year's SMTCOMP.
> The relevant discussion from 2015 is in the thread here:http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/smt-lib/2015/000966.html
The original choice of the SMTLIB is to totalize partial function by accepting all interpretations
instead of fixing one. I understand it as a choice of least surprise for the user. I acknowledge
that in some cases it complicates the work or the efficiency of the solvers.
But for my part I prefer to be sure of what I'm proving, so I prefer the current choice and I'm
worried that adding exceptions to the rule lead to removing the rule.
Why QF_BV division and remainder should be different from any other partial function? Does your
argument should not apply to any SMTLIB partial function?
Best,
--
François Bobot
More information about the SMT-LIB
mailing list