[SMT-LIB] simplify test suite and boogie benchmarks in AUFLIA
Michal Moskal
michal.moskal at gmail.com
Thu May 3 11:54:29 EDT 2007
On 5/2/07, Clark Barrett <barrett at cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
> The first occurrence of distinct is fine. It labels
> a set of symbolic constants as distinct. The second occurrence, however, is
> stating that a set of integers are distinct. This is implied by the underlying
> theory and as such, this is the sort of assumption we don't want too have to
> include in SMT-LIB. Do you have any objection to removing these instances of
> distinct? I can do it on my end unless you don't mind another round...
I've put updated tarball with no distinct-integers stuff, here:
http://nemerle.org/~malekith/smt/benchmarks/simplify_benchmarks-AUFLIA-2007.05.03.tar.bz2
The boogie benchmarks do not contain it.
--
Michał
More information about the SMT-LIB
mailing list