[SMT-LIB] BitVectors32
Christoph M. Wintersteiger
christoph.wintersteiger at inf.ethz.ch
Mon Dec 18 09:07:36 EST 2006
Hi list members!
I have the following problem: The BitVectors32 theory defines these
basic functions:
- Constant symbols bv0 and bv1 of sort BitVec[32]
[[bv0]] := \lambda x : [0...32). 0
[[bv1]] := \lambda x : [0...32). if x = 0 then 1 else 0
However, some of the benchmarks seem to use this as if there was a
function bvX, e.g. QF_UFBV32/crafted/bb.smt wants bv7.
>From the declaration of bv0/bv1 I guess this used to be a definition of
the form bvX anyways. So: should I implement this as bv0/1 and wait for
the benchmark files to be fixed, or should I implement bvX and ignore
the theory definition?
It would also be nice to know what does functions are supposed to do: Is
this kind of an ==0 as in C? or is this supposed to load a bitvector
with the binary representation of X?
Thanks,
Christoph
More information about the SMT-LIB
mailing list