Methodological Shift in Favor of (Some) Paraconsistency in the Sciences - LUW Novenber 16 at 4pm CET

[jean-yves beziau]

Speaker:  María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz
https://www.mariamartinezordaz.com/
Methodological Shift in Favor of (Some) Paraconsistency in the Sciences
Abstract: Many have contended that non-classical logicians have failed at
providing evidence of paraconsistent logics being applicable in cases of
inconsistency toleration in the sciences. With this in mind, my main
concern here is methodological. I aim at addressing the question of how
should we study and explain cases of inconsistent science, using
paraconsistent tools, without ruining into the most common methodological
mistakes. My response is divided into two main parts: first, I provide some
methodological guidance on how to approach cases of inconsistent science;
and second, I focus on a peculiar type of formal methodologies for the
scrutiny of inconsistent reasoning, the Paraconsistent Alternative Approach
(henceforth, PAA) and argue that PAA can enhance a more accurate
understanding of sensible reasoning in inconsistent contexts.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11787-022-00302-y

Chair: Peter Verdee
https://philpeople.org/profiles/peter-verdee
Editorial board LU

Associate Organization:
Mexican Academy of Logic,
https://amlogica.webnode.mx/
presented by its president Abel Rubén Hernández Ulloa
https://www.facebook.com/abelruben

Everybody is welcome to join
Register here:
https://www.springer.com/journal/11787/updates/20065848
Jean-Yves Beziau
Editor-in-Chief Logica Universalis, organizer of LUW
http://www.jyb-logic.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/fom/attachments/20221114/d9399b79/attachment-0001.html>