[FOM] Philosophical Discussion
Harvey Friedman
hmflogic at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 00:05:14 EDT 2016
I see postings by John Corcoran:
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-February/019537.html
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019553.html
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019556.html
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019558.html
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019563.html
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019573.html
These postings obviously have the unrealized potential of stimulating
discussion on some interesting f.o.m. issues here on the FOM.
Generally speaking, discussions seem to most commonly stimulated by
controversial assertions and questions about the f.o.m. issues
themselves.
I for one would be interested in participating in a discussion - and
encourage others to do so - if Corcoran or someone else takes that
route - i.e., making associated postings concerning the actual issues.
Harvey Friedman
More information about the FOM
mailing list