[FOM] Philosophical Discussion

Harvey Friedman hmflogic at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 00:05:14 EDT 2016


I see postings by John Corcoran:

http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-February/019537.html

http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019553.html

http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019556.html

http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019558.html

http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019563.html

http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2016-March/019573.html

These postings obviously have the unrealized potential of stimulating
discussion on some interesting f.o.m. issues here on the FOM.

Generally speaking, discussions seem to most commonly stimulated by
controversial assertions and questions about the f.o.m. issues
themselves.

I for one would be interested in participating in a discussion - and
encourage others to do so - if Corcoran or someone else takes that
route - i.e., making associated postings concerning the actual issues.

Harvey Friedman


More information about the FOM mailing list