[FOM] Seeking sage advice on terminology
Colin McLarty
colin.mclarty at case.edu
Sun Jul 28 22:38:11 EDT 2013
When I write about proofs of FLT I always have trouble finding a graceful
terminology to distinguish proving FLT in PA versus proving in proof theory
that PA |- FLT.
I don't mean the conceptual distinction is difficult. I mean I'd like a
cleaner terminology for it so i don't keep using "proof" to mean two
different things. Maybe the literature I have been reading does have a
solution but if so I have not absorbed it.
Do people here have conventions they use?
best, Colin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/fom/attachments/20130728/3ebc7c8c/attachment.html>
More information about the FOM
mailing list