[FOM] Information required regarding attribution to Kreisel

[william tait]

Thanks.But I wish it had been otherwise. I have no idea how it got into my head that was. I think I'm not wrong about the message though, only about the title. 

Bill

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 1, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Edward Griffor <eg574 at chrysler.com> wrote:

> Bill,
> The original reference you gave was closer to the actual: Objectivity and Objecthood: Frege's Metaphysics of Judgement, which appeared in Hintikka J. & Haaparanta L. (eds.), Frege Synthesized. Kluwer.
> 
> Ed Griffor
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fom-bounces at cs.nyu.edu [mailto:fom-bounces at cs.nyu.edu] On Behalf Of William Tait
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 1:13 PM
> To: Foundations of Mathematics
> Cc: William Tait
> Subject: Re: [FOM] Information required regarding attribution to Kreisel
> 
> I notice that in my response last evening to Haim Gaifman's posting, my bibliographic reference to Tom Rickett's paper contains a significant misprint: The title of the paper is
> 
> "From objectivity to objecthood: Frege's  metaphysics of judgement"
> 
> not
> 
> "From objectivity and objecthood: Frege's  metaphysics of judgement"
> 
> Bill Tait
> _______________________________________________
> FOM mailing list
> FOM at cs.nyu.edu
> http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom
> _______________________________________________
> FOM mailing list
> FOM at cs.nyu.edu
> http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom