[FOM] inconsistency of P
David Diamondstone
ddiamondstone at gmail.com
Thu Sep 29 16:19:05 EDT 2011
> So far as I know, the concept of the "Kolmogorov
> complexity of a theory", as opposed to the Kolmogorov
> complexity of a number, is undefined. Certainly it
> does not occur in Chaitin's theorem or the Kritchman-Raz
> proof.
You can talk about the Kolmogorov complexity of anything that can be coded with a number, including any finitely axiomatizable theory (code the axioms with a number) or any computably axiomatizable theory (code the machine enumerating the axioms with a number).
The point is that Chaitin's proof of the incompleteness theorem reaches a contradiction when the number l is such that the machine which searches through PA proofs for a proof that K(n)>l is actually shorter than l bits. The program of this machine needs to contain a description of PA in order to generate PA proofs, so the number l depends on the theory. If you replaced PA with a different theory, the number l would change, and would always be larger than the Kolmogorov complexity of the theory itself, up to some constant independent of the theory.
More information about the FOM
mailing list