[FOM] Fwd: invitation to comment

Andre.Rodin at ens.fr Andre.Rodin at ens.fr
Sat May 21 14:56:07 EDT 2011

I've just seen a stupid mistake in my last posting

> This is my take on the problem. Hence the following answers to your
> questions:
> >
> > 1. Would the proof of the Poincare conjecture (or some substitute)
> > cease to be regarded as a mathematical proof proper?

NO. I stick to arguing that this theorem has a mathematical proof proper.

This is what I meant to say, sorry I didn't read your wordding carefully and
said YES. The other three answers are as intended.


More information about the FOM mailing list