[FOM] Cardinality in weaker set theories
T.Forster@dpmms.cam.ac.uk
T.Forster at dpmms.cam.ac.uk
Wed Jan 19 06:33:00 EST 2011
On Jan 18 2011, Colin McLarty wrote:
>Thanks to everyone for helpful answers.
>
>I am not sure how to apply the Scott trick to get a set of
>representatives of each cardinality, without replacement. I think the
>key issue is whether you can prove that when all elements of a set S
>have well defined ordinal rank then there is a supremum to their
>ranks, so that S also has well defined rank.
>
I suspect the answer to this might depend on whether you are thinking
of ordinals as von Neumann ordinals, or perhaps have some other
implementation in mind. It might be that, for what you are doing, you
don't need a single global implementation of ordinal arithmetic, but will
be satisfied with local implementations. We might have to look very very
closely at the proof you are trying to formalise.
Scott's trick won't give you *representatives*; what it gives you is an
*implementation of cardinals*. The Scott's trick cardinal |x| is not the
same size as x. But you know all that. If you want representatives you
have to use choice, rather than replacement. Let X be a random large set.
Quotient out the power set of X by equipollence and use choice to pick
representatives from the quotient. Thus you can have `local' families of
representatives. You *might* want these families to *cohere* in nice
ways, and then you might have to start worrying about whether or not every
set has a transitive superset, and that is surely not a theorem of ZC.
Executive summary;
In ZC one cannot define a two-place relation R(x,y) with the property
that for all x there is a unique y s.t. R(x,y) and y is the same size
as x. I think this remains true even if ZC includes foundation, and this
is because ZC doesn't prove that every set has a canonical transitive
superset (secretly the fist V_\alpha to which it belongs). This last
fact means that Scott's trick cardinals (or Scott's trick anything-else
for that matter) are not available *globally*, though they are often
available *locally*.
>_______________________________________________
>FOM mailing list
>FOM at cs.nyu.edu
>http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom
>
More information about the FOM
mailing list