[FOM] From Compactness to Completeness
G. Aldo Antonelli
antonelli at ucdavis.edu
Fri Dec 24 15:39:32 EST 2010
On 12/24/10 12:25 PM, T.Forster at dpmms.cam.ac.uk wrote:
> I think if the language is countable you don'tneed KL, surely?
Well, it seems to me that prima facie you do (but perhaps there is a
clever way around it?):
A non terminating tree is one that, for every n, contains a branch that
does not close at level n. KL is needed to obtain an infinite branch
(which in turn gives the counter-model).
This is true even for a countable language.
Am I missing something?
-- Aldo
*****************************************
G. Aldo Antonelli
Professor of Philosophy
University of California, Davis
http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/antonelli
antonelli at ucdavis.edu +1 530 554 1368
More information about the FOM
mailing list