[FOM] A Question
Arnon Avron
aa at tau.ac.il
Wed Jun 10 01:38:47 EDT 2009
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 03:55:34PM -0500, hdeutsch at ilstu.edu wrote:
> Let L be a language capable of expressing its own syntax. Add to L a
> two place predicate 'impl' satisfying
>
> (1) impl ([A], [B]) < - > (A - > B),
Had this been possible, you could have defined true(x)
as impl([0=0],x), contradicting Tarski's theorem
about the undefinability of the truth predicate.
Arnon Avron
More information about the FOM
mailing list