[FOM] Consistency strength order
hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
Sat May 3 15:03:50 EDT 2008
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:19:19PM -0700, Robert M. Solovay wrote:
> I can't answer your question as to what the right consistency strength
> notion is, in gneeral. But the following (old unpublished) example of
> mine shows that the two notions can diverge. (The theory in question is
> rather artificial.)
> Assume that "ZFC + "there is an inaccessible cardinal" is
> consistent. (Call this theory ZFCI for short.)
> Then there is a theory T, obtained by adjoining a single sentence
> phi to ZFC such that:
> 1) T has the same arithmetical consequences as ZFC.
> 2) It is finitistically (that is, in "primitive recursive
> arithmetic") provable that "Con(T) iff Con(ZFCI)".
> The proof has much in common with the proofs of my old results
> on the provability logic of Peano Arithmetic.
Either this is trivial, or I completely misunderstand it.
Can phi not just be "there is an inaccessible cardinal"? In that case,
T would be ZFCI.
In either case, I would appreciate an explanation of what you meant.
-- hendrik boom
More information about the FOM