[FOM] Formalization Thesis

joeshipman@aol.com joeshipman at aol.com
Thu Jan 3 19:42:05 EST 2008

I repeat my earlier challenge: can anyone who disputes Chow's 
Formalization Thesis respond with a SPECIFIC MATHEMATICAL STATEMENT 
which they are willing to claim is not, despite its expressiblity in 
English text on the FOM discussion forum, "faithfully representable" or 
"adequately expressible" as a sentence in the formal system ZFC?

I don't want an argument that such a statement exists, and I don't want 
a METAmathematical statement, I want an actual English sentence within 
quotation marks that is claimed to be mathematical but not formalizable 
in Chow's sense.

-- JS
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 

More information about the FOM mailing list