[FOM] constructive continuity 2
hendrik@topoi.pooq.com
hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
Fri Feb 15 13:49:38 EST 2008
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 02:55:32AM +0100, Frank Waaldijk wrote:
> Or
> perhaps there is some unforeseen difficulty in moving from {R} to the formal
> interval {[0,1]}? In both cases this seems to me to warrant some further
> thinking.
The fact that [0, 1] is a closed interval, whereas R is like an open
interval (0, 1) is surely relevant.
What, by the way, *is* {[0, 1]} It seems that the formal intervals and
neighbourhoods are joins of open intervals; wherefor they'd correspond
to open sets in R. [0, 1] is not open.
-- hendrik
More information about the FOM
mailing list