[FOM] Concerning definition of formulas
Andy Fugard
a.fugard at ed.ac.uk
Tue Oct 2 16:45:04 EDT 2007
Can't resist sending this, which seems related to a lot of the discussion:
``In fact the notion of truth a la Tarski avoids complete triviality by
the use of the magical expression `meta': we presuppose the existence of
a meta-world, in which logical operations already make sense; the world
of discourse can therefore be interpreted in the meta-world, typically
the truth of A becomes meta-A, and we can in turn explain `meta-A' by
`meta-meta-A' ... We are facing a transcendental explanation of logic
`The rules of logic have been given to us by Tarski, which in turn got
them from Mr. Metatarski', something like `Physical particles act this
way because they must obey the laws of physics' ''
from Jean-Yves Girard
@INPROCEEDINGS{Girard1999,
author = {Jean-Yves Girard},
title = {On the meaning of logical rules {I}: syntax vs. semantics},
booktitle = {Computational Logic},
year = {1999},
editor = {U. Berger and H. Schwichtenberg},
volume = {165},
series = {Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences},
pages = {215--272},
publisher = {Springer Verlag}
}
--
Andy Fugard, Postgraduate Research Student
Psychology (Room F15), The University of Edinburgh,
7 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK
Mobile: +44 (0)78 123 87190 http://www.possibly.me.uk
More information about the FOM
mailing list