[FOM] Goedel on Philosophy
Andrew Boucher
Helene.Boucher at wanadoo.fr
Sun Mar 4 02:23:44 EST 2007
On 3 Mar 2007, at 5:42 PM, praatika at mappi.helsinki.fi wrote:
> Harvey Friedman <friedman at math.ohio-state.edu>:
>
>> Many Philosophers that I know do not believe in such a notion of
>> "progress" in philosophy.
>>
>> I am wondering what FOM subscribers think about this.
>
> I certainly think that there can be genuine progress in philosophy.
>
> Influential theories become refuted for good (e.g., all the key
> theses of
> logical positivism), apparent dichotomies are shown to be non-
> exhaustive
> (e.g. radical scepticism vs strong foundationalism in
> epistemology), false
> background assumptions become exposed, etc.
>
The examples seem primarily to be of the form: philosophy advances
thesis x; then philosophy refutes thesis x. I guess this is progress
of a sort - the same sort where one swats down flies which one has
released oneself.
More information about the FOM
mailing list