[FOM] burden of proof

[Joseph Vidal-Rosset]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dear FOMers,

I wonder if the burden of proof argument (and the reversal of burden)
which is used in the common law as in philosophy has already been a
topic of formal reflection in FOM. I would be happy to know some sketch
on this topic, for example about the realist - anti-realist debate, if
this topic - the burden of proof argument- is considered here as
relevant in FOM, of course. 

All the best, 

Jo.

- -- 
Joseph Vidal-Rosset
Université de Nancy 2
Département de philosophie
Bd Albert 1er
F-54000 Nancy

page web: http://jvrosset.free.fr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGa7koFVqVy0eTtT8RAu8WAJ9JuSN2C40rC061+7ViyWaN28JwTACfZr0j
mX42kvA1SLhb3MgLaCnPHJA=
=p2xF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----