[FOM] The Lucas-Penrose Thesis

Robbie Lindauer robblin at thetip.org
Fri Sep 29 13:54:41 EDT 2006

On Sep 29, 2006, at 10:51 AM, Robbie Lindauer wrote:

> This is irrelevant to the point at hand since the human has a handy 
> proof that they (themselves) are not consistent (e.g. that they won't 
> claim that 1=0)

Sorry, this should read "they (themselves) are consistent" (watching 
too many bushisms).

Robbie Lindauer

More information about the FOM mailing list