[FOM] explicit variables
Thomas Forster
T.Forster at dpmms.cam.ac.uk
Wed May 31 03:12:28 EDT 2006
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Arnon Avron wrote:
>
> Sorry for the stupidity, but what is wrong with or missing from
> the usual Tarskian semantics for formulas with free variables?
>
>
> Arnon Avron
Nothing at all, but that wasn't the implication of my question!
What i was wondering was: is there anywhere in the logical literature
any discussion of the possible significance of the difference between
writing
$F$
and writing
$F(x)$ (to signify that `$x$' is free in $F$)
in - for example - presentations of the rule of UG (and suchlike).
tf
URL: www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~tf Tel: +44-1223-337981
(U Cambridge); +44-7887-701-562 (mobile)
More information about the FOM
mailing list