[FOM] Query for Roger Jones
W.Taylor at math.canterbury.ac.nz
Fri May 12 02:23:53 EDT 2006
Roger Jones, you write:
> In this case the continuum hypothesis has a definite but
> unknown truth value.
Surely this attitude is almost a *definition* of Platonism in math?
> It is this conception which gives a definite
> meaning to the continuum hypothesis in relation to which it is
> a genuine, objective and significant, open problem,
How can it be in any way an objective open problem, unless one is
a Platonist as regards set theory? I can't see how, otherwise.
> those (like me) who are not platonists in the popular sense of that term.
So in what sense ARE you a Platonist then?
More information about the FOM