[FOM] Tennant on relevant logic
neilt at mercutio.cohums.ohio-state.edu
Mon Mar 6 16:33:52 EST 2006
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, A.P. Hazen wrote:
> I have an awful feeling that two different things are being
> discussed without distinguishing between them. Could Professor
> Tennant say something about the relation between his "Classical
> Relevant Logic" (and his real favorite, "Intuitionistic Relevant
> Logic") and the systems studied in the tradition starting with
> Ackermann, Anderson and Belnap?
I did say quite a bit on this score recently in reply to an email from
but that email does not seem to have been posted yet on fom.
Did you receive the email in question, with the discussion of the
difference between the Anderson-Belnap systems and the systems of relevant
logic that I favor?
If you received a copy of that message, would you be so kind as to send it
back to me, so that I can send it to fom? (Unfortunately I didn't keep a
copy of it.)
More information about the FOM