[FOM] query about complexity of the theory of [R,+, < ]
John Baldwin
jbaldwin at uic.edu
Mon Nov 3 14:43:13 EST 2003
At 11:01 AM 11/3/2003 -0800, Martin Davis wrote:
>A former colleague has asked me about the complexity of this theory:
>a) when R is the reals,
>b) when R is the rationals
>and has also asked whether the two are elementarily equivalent.
This these are models of the theory of divisible ordered abelian groups: it
is complete. In fact, as a reduct of (R, +, *,<) we see the second
structure is o-minimal (and so the first).
Since I gave you an axiomatization the theory is decidable. I don't know
more refined bounds but Marker suggests there are at least exponential
lower bounds
on the complexity.
>Information about the most recent results along these lines would be
>appreciated.
>
>Martin
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>FOM mailing list
>FOM at cs.nyu.edu
>http://www.cs.nyu.edu/mailman/listinfo/fom
More information about the FOM
mailing list