[FOM] Modified Rosser sentences

Thomas Forster T.Forster at dpmms.cam.ac.uk
Tue Jul 15 10:44:50 EDT 2003

Granted - i was being careless.

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Torkel Franzen wrote:

>  >The (sic) Rosser sentence says ``there is a proof of me
>  >s.t. no proof with lower gnumber is a proof of not-me''.
>   Not quite right - rather, "for every x, if x is a proof of me, then
> there is a proof < x of not-me".

More information about the FOM mailing list