[FOM] Independence without forcing
Todd.Eisworth@uni.edu
Todd.Eisworth at uni.edu
Sun Jul 13 05:59:13 EDT 2003
[Reply to Friedman]
In the archives, I found a post by Gaifman where he asks about
V=L and "hard core independence proofs". If I interpret things
correctly, he and I are asking nearly the same thing. Here's a more
precise formulation.
Consider the following position:
"All statements of 'real mathematics' are decided in the axiom system
ZF + V=L + there are no inaccessible cardinals; all other statements
are metamathematical."
I am giving 'real mathematics' a loose interpretation --- almost
anything except a Godel sentence counts. The position as stated does
not claim that the quoted axioms are true, only that everything of
interest is decided by them.
Is the position a valid one or not? Assuming it is not, is a
refutation in the realm of 'science-fiction', or will I discover the
answer sometime in the coming week while I'm reading more about
Boolean relation theory?
Best,
Todd
More information about the FOM
mailing list