FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity

Thomas Forster T.Forster at dpmms.cam.ac.uk
Fri Oct 13 12:45:59 EDT 2000

Previous message: FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Next message: FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This mailing list is for foundations of mathematics, not theology!

>Is it known whether CH is independent of 2nd-order validity?

Previous message: FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Next message: FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the FOM mailing list