FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Roger Bishop Jones
rbjones at rbjones.com
Fri Oct 13 08:33:17 EDT 2000
Previous message:
FOM: Correction: Midwest PhilMath Workshop, December 9
Next message:
FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Is it known whether CH is independent of 2nd-order validity? Roger Jones
RBJones at RBJones.com
Previous message:
FOM: Correction: Midwest PhilMath Workshop, December 9
Next message:
FOM: CH and 2nd-order validity
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the FOM mailing list