FOM: ordered pair: Bourbaki

Vedasystem@aol.com Vedasystem at aol.com
Tue May 4 17:50:23 EDT 1999


In a message dated 5/4/99 2:13:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
trybulec at math.uwb.edu.pl writes:

> One cannot prove it anyway
>  
>      (x,y) U {x} = {{x},{x,y}} U {x} = {{x},{x,y},x} =/= (x,y)
>  by regularity.
>  

Sorry, of course, the right "theorem" is (x, y) U {{x}} = (x, y), because 
(x,y) = { {x}, {x, y} }.

V. Makarov



More information about the FOM mailing list