FOM: Reply to Hersh: why isn't it a theorem?
Reuben Hersh
rhersh at math.unm.edu
Thu Jan 22 23:19:13 EST 1998
Previous message:
FOM: Reply to Hersh: why isn't it a theorem?
Next message:
FOM: Set Theory Axioms
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
I see what you mean. I am thinking about it. Reuben Hersh
Previous message:
FOM: Reply to Hersh: why isn't it a theorem?
Next message:
FOM: Set Theory Axioms
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the FOM mailing list