

dilip: discussion of splaying fine, joins is fine.
(I would have liked you to be more empirical, as opposed to quoting
from the manual, but at least you found the right spots to quote.)
vwap is nice
antibundle is nice but should be 0 > deltas

Hari-om: discussion of joins is fine.
(I would have liked you to be more empirical, as opposed to quoting
from the manual, but at least you found the right spots to quote.)
vwap very nice.
Nice job also on anti-bundle.

Neha:
Nice empirical work on the join types.
For splaying, you were to explore the limitations of what could be done
with splayed talbes as opposed to normal ones.
vwap is nice.
antibundle has a strange 132.5 which comes from the amount in your tmp3

Prateek:
join work is nice; thanks for being empirical.
Similarly for splay tables; you also hit all the important points.
vwap was nicely done.
antibundle is very nice.

Rohit:
join and splay work was nicely described and you ran some experiments
which was good.
vwap worked nicely though you might have spread out your time
values a bit more in your data generation.
antibundle was very nice.

Urvashi:
Your discussion of join types and splays was nicely empirical and 
hit all the important points.
Trying things out is key.
vwap and antibundle are nicely programmed.

Abhay:
Still need a discussion of the limitations of splaying
Tests on joins are nice.
vwap and antibundle are nicely programmed.

Meena:
Your comparison of joins is empirical -- very good.
You still need an empirical study of the limitations of operations on splay
vwap is nicely programmed.
antibundle works well.
antibundle is nicely programmed.

Pranita:
Your comparison of joins is nicely empirical.
You still need an empirical study of the limitations of operations on splay
vwap near a time point
and antibundle are nicely programmed.

Heramb:
Discussion of joins could have had some more tests, but is otherwise fine.
You still need an empirical study of the limitations of operations on splay
vwap near a time point
and antibundle are nicely programmed.

Ramanpreet:
Nice discussion of splays including examples.
nice empirical approach to comparing join types.
vwap worked nicely (though why did you choose 8 AM as starting point?)
antibundle is nice.

Sandhya:
join types are nicely discussed.
We still need a discussion of splaying and what its limitations are.
vwap works nicely.
antibundle works nicely.

Showvik:
join discussion is nice -- i hope you did some of your own experiments.
nice discussion of splaying
home_3 (vwap) keeps throwing a type error concerning within.
Still need antibundle
	second time is ok

Swati:
Nice job with splay, very empirical (good cooperation with Sweta).
A little less empirical for joins, but clear enough.
vwap might be ok, but you need to call the function gettime.
Please work with another student on this.
Still need antibundle
	Nice job the second time

Sweta:
Good that you cooperated with Swati on the splay work
Nice empirical work on join types.
vwap is fine
antibundle is very nice

Tanay:
Nice empirical work on splay and joins.
vwap is fine
antibundle works well.

Vinod:
Nice empirical work on joins.
You hit all the important points on splay.
vwap is fine
antibundle works well.


============== thanksgiving submissions

naina:
Nice empirical work on joins and splaying.
vwap is nice
antibundle is nice.

Alind:
joins are ok except for the typo in the description of ej.
splay table hits all the high points.
vwap and antibundle are nice.
Great. On to the project!
