[SMT-COMP] Incremental QF_BV, addition with >2 operands
Trevor Hansen
trev_abroad at yahoo.com
Sat Jun 1 21:40:07 EDT 2019
In the incremental QF_BV benchmarks, The
/20170501-Heizmann-UltimateAutomizer/jain_5_true-unreach-call_true-no-overflow.i.smt2
benchmark has additions with >2 operands.
For example:
(set-info :smt-lib-version 2.6)
(set-logic QF_BV)
(declare-fun c_main_~x~4 () (_ BitVec 32))
(declare-fun c_main_~y~4 () (_ BitVec 32))
(assert
(distinct
(bvadd
c_main_~y~4
c_main_~x~4
(_ bv4294967266 32)
)
(_ bv0 32)
)
)
(check-sat)
This example is parsed and solved by z3, mathsat, boolector, yices2, and
cvc4. So addition with >2 operands has wide support.
The solvers I'm involved with don't parse it. Although it's easy for me to
change that.
Am I confused, are >2 operands allowed?
Even if they are currently not allowed, is the use so widespread they
should be allowed?
Thanks,
Trev.
More information about the SMT-COMP
mailing list