[SMTCOMP] a question on the benchmark scrambler
Leonardo de Moura
demoura at csl.sri.com
Fri Jul 21 10:47:03 EDT 2006
Hi Alberto,
> Am I right or not?
Yes you are correct.
> And if I'm right, is there any particular reason why this is not
> done? Not that
> I'm saying that this must (or should) be done, it is more a
> curiosity...
I didn't do that because in QF_RDL and QF_IDL the linear arithmetic
atoms should have a specific format:
- (op (- x y) c),
- (op (- x y) (~ c)),
where op is "=, <, <=, >=, >"
I didn't want to change this format in the output produced by the
scrambler
because some tools may assume it.
Anyway, if nobody depends on this restriction I can modify the scrambler
to permute equalities.
Leonardo
More information about the SMT-COMP
mailing list