`This light of the world, and city on a mountain, and candle upon a candlestick, signifieth the Clergy, and the whole Church, so built upon Christ the mountain, that it must needs be visible, and cannot be hid nor unknown. Aug. cont. Fulg. Donat. c. 18. Li. 16. cont. Faust. c. 17. And therefore, the Church being a candle nor under a bushel, but shining to all in the house (that is) in the world, what shall I say more (saith St. Augustine) than that they are blind which shut their eyes against the candle that is set on the candlestick? Tract. 2. in ep. 10.'
-- Annotation in the Douay-Rheims version of the Holy Bible, 1582.
Likeness of His Grace the Most Reverend Mar Augustine Kandathil, D. D.
Nihil obstat: Fr. Thomas Moothedan, M. A., D. D., Nirmala College, Muvattupuzha, 16-11-1960.
Low-resolution image of detail of Portrait in oil paint by Artist Mr. P. J. Cherian, Puthanangady, c. 1923.
Central Hall, Archbishop's House, Ernakulam.
(High-resolution image available on request.)
Imprimatur: Mgr. George Valliarumpath, Vicar-General, Ernakulam, 12-12-1960.
Publisher: George Thalian, D. D., Assisi Mount, Neerpara, 30-6-1993.
Printer: Mar Louis Memorial Press, Broadway, Ernakulam.
© 1961, 1993, 2006. David C. Kandathil, Chempu, Vaikom (kandathil@gmail.com). All rights reserved.
His early life
He was born at Chempu, in Vaikom, Kerala, on the 25th of August 1874, and was brought up in the spirit of a Christian family that taught him to love God more and more as he grew older. He completed his priestly studies in the Papal Seminary, Kandy, and was ordained priest on the 21st of December 1901 at Kandy by Rt. Rev. Dr. Clemente Pagnani, O. S. B., the then Bishop of Kandy. Afterwards, he returned to his Vicariate of Ernakulam and was made the first Rector of the Petit Seminary there. He carried out his duty to the great satisfaction of his Bishop up to 1911. In between he had been vicar in two places (Vadayar and Kulasekharamangalam), and within a short time, by his ardent zeal and holiness, he proved himself an excellent parish priest after the Sacred Heart of Jesus.
He was consecrated Bishop on the 3rd of December 1911 at Kandy by Most Rev. Dr. Władysław Michał Zaleski, the then Delegate-Apostolic to India, and was appointed Coädjutor (on the 29th of August 1911) to the then Vicar-Apostolic, Rt. Rev. Mar Louis Pazheparambil, of the Vicariate of Ernakulam. At the death of the Bishop Mar Louis on the 9th of December 1919, he became the Vicar-Apostolic of the Vicariate. When the Syro-Malabar Hierarchy was established and the Vicariate was raised to the status of an Archdiocese on the 21st of December 1923, he was made the Archbishop. And it was his privilege to be the first Indian Archbishop in power and administration.
In the Jubilee Year 1925 he visited the Holy father Pope Pius XI and the eternal city for the first and only time. In 1926 he celebrated his sacerdotal silver jubilee. Then in the year 1936 he celebrated the silver jubilee as a Bishop. On that jubilee day the title of the Official Assistant at the Pontifical Throne was conferred on him. He was the first to receive this honour in India. Again he had the privilege to celebrate the golden jubilee of his ordination, and it was celebrated in a splendid way. The crowning function of it was the Eucharistic procession conducted with all grandeur and solemnity at Ernakulam.
His auxiliary
In his old age he longed for an auxiliary to help him and his longing was fulfilled by the Holy See in the year 1953. He found it difficult to do all the multifarious duties of administration single-handedly since he had become very weak and old. The good news of the appointment of his auxiliary was announced by the Dean of the Cardinals, Most Rev. Dr. Eugène Tisserant himself, when he arrived at Ernakulam on 11th November 1953 with the holy relics of St. Thomas. Rt. Rev. Mar Joseph Parecattil was chosen as his auxiliary who later became his successor.
Extension of the Hierarchy
29th April 1955 was a red letter day in the history of the Syrian Church in Kerala, because it was on that day that the decree of the extension of the Syrian Hierarchy was published and granted by the Holy See mainly due to the ceaseless efforts of Mar Augustine Kandathil. He refers to it in his pastoral letter thus: `Personally speaking I tried my level best for it with the help of my suffragan bishops. I am glad to see that our efforts proved fruitful and I thank God Almighty for it in a special manner. I believe that it will help the Church in India both spiritually and materially to grow and flourish more and more in her achievements.'
His mortified life of virtues
He was known for his solid piety. Love for the poor and purity of life were the two virtues shining in him most. His personal capacity was the moving force for all the achievements. His motto `In te speravi' [I trust in Thee] was the guiding principle of his life. Every action of his was a reflection of his well chosen motto for life. He was convinced that all his endeavours had to be stamped with the divine help to bring forth fruits. He firmly believed that all his strength was from God, and lived the life of a faithful soldier of Christ accordingly. The hand of God was manifest in all his undertakings throughout his life. He was a man of prayer. He found consolation and hope in prayer. Every day he drew strength for his hard work from the power-house of grace through prayer and penance. The external activities of his pastoral life were the signs of his union with the Good Shepherd Jesus Christ.
Shepherd of souls
He served the Syrian Church in Kerala at large and the Archdiocese of Ernakulam in particular for 44 long years with the generous heart of Jesus the Good Shepherd. His service will be remembered by the future generations of Kerala with feelings of gratitude and reverence. The Archdiocese of Ernakulam is indebted to him much.
He was a man of principle, and he regulated his works of administration accordingly. He established order everywhere, whether in the accounts of the parish or of any pious institution. He had a well thought-out plan for everything. For the ruling of the diocese, he adapted a proper and accurate form of administration according to the needs of the times. Laws were laid down regarding the administration of the parish property and things connected with it. He was attentive to every detail of administration. In the beginning, he had to face a lot of difficulties in bringing order in all these matters. But with a strong and resolute mind he overcame all these difficulties. To safeguard the rights of the Church in Kerala he worked hard and achieved success. He had the happiness of seeing the fruits of his labour before his death. To a great extent the Syrian Hierarchy owes to Mar Augustine Kandathil, its head, for its success then and after.
For the good of his children entrusted to him, and others too, he was ready to do everything he could. He could overcome any obstacle on the way to his end in view, by his undying motive force which was the love of God. It was as it were in his nature to go ahead amidst troubles either from within or without in order to do good to the people. Though he was strict and exacting in his dealings, he was broad-minded and far-sighted. First and foremost he was strict to himself, and that was the sign of the sincerity of his purpose.
The poor and the down-trodden had a special place in the corner of his magnanimous heart which was aglow with the love of God. He left no stone unturned for doing good to them. They could see in him Christ going about doing good. All the hospitals in the Archdiocese, meant for the different kinds of people suffering from all sorts of diseases including leprosy, bear witness to his love of God and love of the poor. Orphanages for the young and old were dear to his heart and they had their origin from him. He was not satisfied with merely founding these institutions for the poor but also saw to it that they really proved helpful to the poor. To look after the sick and poor of different walks of life, he founded different religious congregations both for men and women. Well-trained sisters were mainly given the charge of the sick and old, and especially the lepers. As often as he could, he visited the hospitals and the other institutions and examined their working, giving necessary corrections and directions so that they might serve their purpose well. Thus he is rightly called the lover of the poor and the needy.
The protector of Catholic schools
To have a lively faith in God it is necessary that children be given Christian education. He understood this fundamental principle very well and lived for it. He fought for it boldly and unceasingly against the opposing forces. He vindicated the right of the Church to give them proper education. When others were wavering about it, he proved a sure guide and powerful leader to bring them to the proper channels and make them also fight with him for the cause. To show how much he worked for Christian education, it will be helpful to know the number of colleges, schools, and other institutions meant for the cause, he had in his Archdiocese. The Nirmala College at Muvattupuzha will be a standing monument to his thirst for having a new Catholic college in his Archdiocese for the better formation of the modern youth. When he died, there were 2 colleges, 31 high schools, 42 middle schools, 138 primary schools, 2 teachers' training schools, 5 industrial schools, and 25 boarding houses, in his Archdiocese for the purpose of imparting Catholic education.
Again, with a view to safeguard the faith of the people, he spread Catholic literature on all topics, especially on matters of importance as the time demanded. The most widely circulated and appreciated Catholic weekly `Sathyadeepam' [സത്യദീപം] bears witness to his love of Catholic literature. He started it and maintained it as the apple of his eye. There was a daily, `The Malabar Mail' [മലബാര് മെയില്], the souvenir of his episcopal silver jubilee. This is an outstanding success of his strenuous efforts in this matter.
"The Education Bill was passed by the Kerala Assembly on 2nd September 1957 and forwarded to the President for his approval... Unexpectedly, in view of his general sympathy with left-wing movements, Krishna Menon, after a visit to Cochin (December 1957), reported that there was a considerable deterioration in the situation in Kerala. Far more sinister trends were developing than might be inferred from the seeming quiet on the surface and he expected conditions to become worse... Clearly his evaluation, rather than the perennial complaints of the local Congress and the Governor's reports, influenced Nehru, and the new year (1958) saw the Prime Minister more critical than before of the E. M. S. Namboodiripad Government... He continued to deprecate the recourse to violent methods by the opposition in Kerala, but now suggested that the state of tension and conflict were largely due to the attitude and activities of the Communist Party. He was once more reïterating his dislike of the Communist approach, its promotion of class bitterness and hatred, the rejection of accepted standards of public behaviour, and the proneness to seek guidance abroad. It was now his view that the Communists in Kerala were adopting the Leninist tactic of pretending to accept `bourgeois' democracy as a legitimate move in the struggle to establish Communist supremacy. `I don't want Communism here.'... In August (1958), for the first time Nehru spoke publicly in terms critical of the Kerala Government, and declared that he had not been convinced by their answers to the charges. He disliked the spiral of violent demonstrations leading to police firings and... sympathised with their predicament when surrounded by angry mobs. But he blamed the state Government for terrorising people, a development which had nothing to do with Communism and... was clear that the situation could not be ignored... A report by Krishna Menon on a visit to Kerala, which the state Government denounced as a `conducted tour', confirmed Nehru's attitude. Subsequent developments and information also lent support to his view that a considerable section of the people in Kerala had a feeling of `political insecurity' in the sense that some political parties were being harassed and others protected."
-- Sarvepalli Gopal, in `Jawaharlal Nehru: A biography', Volume III, 1956-1964, Oxford University Press, 1984, pp. 57-58, 63-64.
Reunion of the separated
To bring the separated brethren back to the true fold of Christ, he helped the Archbishop Most Rev. Geevarghese Mar Ivanios Panicker, O. I. C. and his followers. He could see only with great sorrow the separated churches of disorder and confusion leading the sheep astray. He did, therefore, everything possible for their long expected reunion with the true Church of Christ. He prayed for it with the heart of a good shepherd. His last pastoral letter treated of the reunion of his separated brethren. He says: `My earnest prayer and desire is that the separated brethren may come to the true fold soon. I am longing for it and I invite them all with a fatherly heart.'
The spiritual renovation of the faithful
For the spiritual nourishment and growth of the people entrusted to him, he introduced many useful and timely ways and means by which they could grow in sanctity. The spreading of the devotion to the Sacred Heart was the first and best among the many.
He exhorted the faithful that they should dedicate their homes to the Sacred Heart and make Him the Ruler of their homes. Each and every action of theirs must be governed by that Ruler. He made compulsory that there should be an annual retreat in every parish. All the parishioners were expected to take part in it deriving spiritual strength for the whole year. Devotion to the Sacred Passion of Our Lord was spread in many parishes; it produced wonderful effects on the people and they began to understand more the dignity of suffering in their lives. Feasts were celebrated with more spirit of prayer and interior reform of the participants. Sacraments were administered in more regulated and unified forms according to the importance and sanctity of each one. Children were taught catechism in the Catholic schools and parishes and encouraged with prizes for distinction in it. The grown-ups were also given lessons of catechism according to their ability of understanding the sublime truths about Christ and His Church on earth. All his attempts both for the spiritual and temporal welfare of the Archdiocese of Ernakulam met with grand and unqualified success and it is noticeable in priests, parishes, religious, faithful, and in institutions of various kinds. The secret of his success lies in his well-chosen motto of life: `In te speravi'. It did not remain a dead letter. It was the lodestar of his life till he breathed his last.
The end of his life
Let us hear about his happy and peaceful death, in the very words of his successor Most Rev. Mar Joseph Parecattil: `He had the privilege to die a peaceful and happy death because his life was such. He lived in faith and prayer. He received all the last sacraments in perfect serenity and in his senses. Together with the Extreme unction, he himself asked for Viaticum. Before receiving the Holy Communion, he said the `confiteor' distinctly. While he was given Extreme unction after the anointing of every member, he answered clearly `Amen'. Then he breathed his last with the last words `Sacred Heart of Jesus, I trust in Thee'. Thus he sealed his life of faith and confidence; with these words he commended his soul to the Father. As he lived, so he died, fulfilling the will of God on earth. His long life of dedication to the Church and to his country gloriously came to an end here on earth.'
`Blessed is the rich man that is found without spot: and that hath not gone after gold, nor hoped in money and treasures. Who is this, & we will praise him, for he hath done marvelous things in his life. Who is proved therein, & perfect, shall have eternal Glory. He that could transgress, and hath not transgressed: and do evils, and hath not done: therefore are his good things stablished in our Lord, & all the church of saints shall declare his alms.' (Eccles. 31:8-11.) What beautiful words! He was a man to whom the Lord gave five talents, and he gained another five. What is his reward? Entrance into the joy of the Lord. (Matt. 25:21.)
I believe that Mar Augustine Kandathil of happy memory is now in heaven interceding for the Church in India, especially in Kerala, and for his country at large. By Divine Providence, the example of his life is a lesson delivered to the present age, of self-sacrifice and over-flowing generosity towards God and man.
Preface to the first edition *
This is not a biography, much less a history, of the illustrious and esteemed late Archbishop of Ernakulam Most Rev. Mar Augustine Kandathil, D. D. But this is only a faint echo of the feelings of affection and admiration that well up in my heart for the incandescent personality of the Archbishop who has inspired my life, enkindled my spirits, and who still fills my mind with memories never to fade. In the fond hope that these pages will constitute a humble acknowledgement of the deep debt of gratitude I owe him, I publish this on the fifth anniversary of his departure from this world.
George Thalian.
Tiruchirappalli,
10th January 1961.
* The first edition was published under the title `The First Indian Archbishop, His Grace Most Rev. Mar Augustine Kandathil, D. D.'
Preface to the second edition
I published this book first on the 10th of January 1961, when I was a student in the Seminary, Trichy. Years passed, times changed, the numbers of the Bishops and the Archbishops including the Cardinals increased in the Catholic Church of India, and in Kerala in particular. Still the Archbishop Mar Augustine Kandathil stands out as the Great Archbishop, especially in Kerala, even now in my mind when there is a Major Archbishop in the Syro-Malabar Church in Kerala. He was a man of strong decision and action, with strong mind and heart looking ahead of the times. Moreover he was a leader in the Catholic Church, concerned more about the people of God and priests in the Church, with discipline, more than anything else.
With the memories of all these of the past, I think that the Major Archbishop at present must be the Great one with all these qualities of mind and heart of action for the unity in the Syro-Malabar Church, especially in the liturgy, and the discipline among the priests and the religious more than anything else. The high title with authority and power is not enough. It has to be exercised for the good of the whole Church at large in the way acceptable to all as far as possible.
This is the reason why I publish this very short life history of that great man, the Archbishop, Mar Augustine Kandathil, as an outstanding model to the people and priests, and even to the Bishops and Archbishops of Kerala Catholic Church at present.
Let me thank all those who have helped me to publish this booklet and read this with a spirit of sharing.
George Thalian, D. D.
Assisi Mount, Neerpara,
30-6-1993.
Foreword
This booklet is the outline of the biography of the illustrious ecclesiastical dignitary, Mar Augustine Kandathil, the first Archbishop of the Syro-Malabar Church. It is a reprint of what the author had published in 1961 as a humble token of his appreciation, love, and gratitude, to his Archbishop.
At this juncture of the history of the Syro-Malabar Church, it is relevant to recall the memory of this great Archbishop. One wishes he were alive today. He would have provided the much needed strong and enlightened leadership during these troubled times. While he was alive he fearlessly and tirelessly fought for defending the rights and privileges of the Church he loved, of which he was the undisputed leader. It was he who laid the foundations for the progress the Syro-Malabar Church has made in recent times, against great odds. As early as in 1955, Archbishop Kandathil had the vision and courage to declare that we should have a liturgy that is progressive and dynamic and suited to the culture of our great nation and changing times. He would surely have been the obvious choice to be the first Major Archbishop or Patriarch of the Syro-Malabar Church. His death leaves a void that may take long to fill adequately.
Let us hope that his unique qualities of leadership will inspire future generations to emulate him to restore unity and prosperity in the Syro-Malabar Church.
Fr. Thomas Mulavarickal, B. A., L. Ph., L. D. (1922 - 1952 - † 29 Jul. 2000)
Green Gardens, Shertallay,
13-12-1992.
Selected details on his life
Most Reverend Mar Augustine Kandathil, D. D. [മഹാവന്ദ്യ ദിവ്യശ്രീ കണ്ടത്തില് മാര് ആഗസ്തീനോസ് മെത്രാപ്പോലീത്താ, ഡി. ഡി.] (b. at Chempu [ചെമ്പു്], near Vaikom [വൈയ്ക്കം], in Kottayam [കോട്ടയം], Kingdom of Travancore [തിരുവിതാങ്കൂര് രാജ്യം], 25th August 1874; † d. at Ernakulam [എറണാകുളം], Travancore-Cochin [തിരുവിതാങ്കൂര്-കൊച്ചി], India, 10th January 1956) was the first and longest-serving Metropolitan and Head of the Catholic Church of St. Thomas [Syro-Malabar Church], the principal Church of the St. Thomas Christians [മാര് തോമ്മാ ക്രിസ്ത്യാനികള്] in India. He was the first Indian to assume powers and reign as an Archbishop of the Catholic Church [a].
Family
He was the second son of Mr. Kandathil Thommen Warkey [ശ്രീ കണ്ടത്തില് തൊമ്മന് വര്ക്കി] (1844-1920) of the Church of St. Thomas, Chempu [Founded: 1307], and Mrs. Thresia Warkey [ശ്രീമതി ത്രേസ്യാ വര്ക്കി] née Nurokkary [നുറോക്കരി] (1849-1939) of the Church of St. George, Manvettom [മാന്വെട്ടം] [Founder: Chavara Kuriakose Kathanar [ചാവറ കുരിയാക്കോസ് കത്തനാര്] (3rd October 1843)]. During his childhood, he grew up under the tutelage of his paternal uncle Kandathil Thoma Kathanar [കണ്ടത്തില് തോമ്മാ കത്തനാര്] (1856 - 1880 - † 5th July 1912), Vicar of Chempu (without accepting salary) for three decades. His parents lie buried within the vaults of the Church at Chempu, and his uncle at the main altar.
He was named in honour of the patron of the Church of St. Augustine, Ramapuram [രാമപുരം] [Founder: Dom Aleixo de Menezes, O. S. A. (1599)], to whom his mother solemnly dedicated him. He was baptised in the Church at Manvettom. Plaques at Ramapuram and Manvettom commemorate these events.
Formation: Kandathil Thoma Kathanar, Mannanam, Kandy
His formation began under the direction of his paternal uncle Kandathil Thoma Kathanar. He attended Government School, Kulasekharamangalam [കുലശേഖരമംഗലം], Chempu, and Government English School, Vaikom. He joined Carmel Seminary, Vazhakulam, Muvattupuzha [Founder: Jacob Kanatt of St. Mary, T. O. C. D. (1826 - 1850 - † 10 Jun. 1885) (1866); Closed: 1890] on 4 Nov. 1887 and read Syriac there. Mgr. Charles Lavigne, S. J. [b] directed that he join St. Joseph's Seminary, Mannanam [Founder: Palackal Thoma Malpan (1833); Rector: Geevarghese Parappuram of St. John the Baptist, T. O. C. D. (1835 - 1859 - † 28 May 1908); Closed: 1894], which he did on 24 Jul. 1888; during this period, he attended the newly founded St. Berchmans High School, Changanacherry [Founder: Mgr. Charles Lavigne, S. J. (6 Nov. 1840 - 1864 - † 11 Jul. 1913) (4 Feb. 1891)] to read more English. He then left in 1893 to join the newly founded Papal Seminary [Leonianum], Ampitiya, Kandy, Ceylon [Founder: Pope Leo XIII (18 May 1893); Rector: Sylvain Grosjean, S. J. (1846-1915) [Leo PP. XIII 1893]] run by Belgian members of the Society of Jesus; one of the lecturers there was the historian Henri Hosten, S. J.
Rector of Petit Seminary, Mar Aloysius Pareparambil, Coädjutor
He was ordained priest on 21st December 1901 and appointed the first rector of the Sacred Heart Petit Seminary at Ernakulam; he continued to take an important part in the spiritual formation of seminarians throughout his life. He also served as a parish priest at Church of the Infant Jesus, Vadayar [വടയാര്], Vaikom [Founded: 1360] (1905-1907) (founding the School of St. Louis under the church) and at the filial Church of Kulasekharamangalam [കുലശേഖരമംഗലം] under Kandathil Thoma Kathanar in Chempu. After being appointed Coädjutor on 29th August 1911 to the Vicar-Apostolic of Ernakulam, Mar Aloysius Pareparambil (Louis Pazheparambil) [പഴേപറമ്പില് മാര് ളൂയീസ്] (1896-1919) [b], he was consecrated Bishop on 3rd December 1911.
During his tenure as Coädjutor, he diverged from Bishop Pazheparambil on the question of certain expenditures of money, and consequently, he left Ernakulam and moved to the Forane Church of St. Mary, Koratty [കൊരട്ടി] [Founded: 1381]; in solidarity, a priest of the Vicariate, Fr. Jacob Naduvathussery [ഫാ. ജേക്കബ് നടുവത്തുശ്ശേരി], went with him. Later, the Bishop and the Coädjutor reconciled, and the latter resumed residence at Ernakulam.
He succeeded Bishop Pazheparambil as Vicar-Apostolic at the latter's death on † 9th December 1919. The epitaph which he composed of his predecessor has been widely admired; Mr. I. C. Chacko, Illiparambil, chose to conclude his biography [Illiparambil 1937] of Mar Louis Pazheparambil with it: `A Prelate specially devoted to the Blessed Virgin, simple in ways, frugal in habits, ever devoted to the interests of his Rite and Nation, steadfast of purpose, yet tactful in action, a scholar, a linguist, a historian, and a diplomat, he was a great Indian.'
Hierarchy of the St. Thomas Christians
The Hierarchy of the St. Thomas Christians [Syro-Malabar Hierarchy] was founded by Pope Pius XI on 21st December 1923 [Pius PP. XI 1924] with the Archdiocese of Ernakulam [എറണാകുളം അതിരൂപത] as its capital See and Archbishop Mar Augustine Kandathil as its first Metropolitan and Head, with suffragan Dioceses of Changanacherry, Kottayam (Southist), and Trichur, respectively under Bishops Mar Thomas Kurialacherry [S. A. B. S. (E); S. B.] (1911-1925), Mar Alexander Choolaparambil [O. S. H.; B. C. M.; Apna Des] (1914-1951), and Mar Francis Vazhapilly (1921-1942); this was the culmination of the centuries-old struggle for sovereignty in the Catholic Church of St. Thomas [Syro-Malabar Church] [b].
Mar Augustine Kandathil was installed Archbishop and invested with the sacred pallium on 16th November 1924 (by the Visitor-Apostolic Mgr. Alexis-Henri-Marie Lépicier, O. S. M.) and led the Church from its helm as Metropolitan for three and a half decades, until his demise at the age of 81. Other suffragan bishops who served under him include Mar James Kalacherry [M. C. B. S.; A.] (Changanacherry, 1927-1949), Mar George Alapatt [H.] (Trichur, 1944-1970), Mar Thomas Tharayil [B. C. M.; C.] (Kottayam (Southist), 1945-1974), Mar Matthew Kavukattu [S. T.] (Changanacherry, 1950-1969), Mar Sebastian Vayalilkalapura (Vayalil) [M. S. T.; S. T.; A.; S. M. C.] (Palai, 1950-1981), Mar Joseph Parecattil [B. M.; X.] (Ernakulam (Auxiliary), 1953-1984), and Mar Sebastian Valloppilly [N.] (Tellicherry, 1955-1989).
Mgr. Jacob Kallarackal [Callarackal] (23rd June 1863 - † 4th March 1956) served as Administrator-Apostolic of the Diocese of Changanacherry during two interregna (1925-1927, 1949-1950) following the untimely deaths of Bishops Mar Thomas Kurialacherry (14th January 1973 - † 2nd June 1925) and Mar James Kalacherry (20th April 1892 - † 27th October 1949); Mgr. Matthew Edakkalathur (1887-1947), respectively, of the Diocese of Trichur (1942-1944), following the untimely death of Bishop Mar Francis Vazhapilly (18th May 1878 - † 12th May 1942). At the death of Mar Alexander Choolaparambil (14th October 1877 - † 8th January 1951), his Coädjutor succeeded him. Fr. Sebastian Valloppilly served as Administrator-Apostolic of the fledgeling Diocese of Tellicherry (1953-1955) before being appointed Bishop.
As an administrator, Archbishop Kandathil was noted for his eye for detail; he established systematic methods and practices of administration, accountancy, and surveying in the Church. The Maharaja of Cochin adopted his innovations in accountancy to the administration of the Kingdom of Cochin. In the tasks of administration, he was assisted by various Vicars-General, including Mgr. Bernard Madambhagath [മോണ്. ബര്ണാര്ഡ് മാടംഭാഗത്തു്] (1912-1922), Mgr. Thomas Nedumkallel, Sr. [മോണ്. തോമസ് നെടുംകല്ലേല്] (1923-1936), Mgr. George Valliarumpath [മോണ്. ജോര്ജ്ജു് വല്ല്യാറമ്പത്തു്] (1936-1945), and Mgr. Matthew Pothanamuzhi [മോണ്. മാത്യൂ പോത്തനാമൂഴി] (1945-1954).
Rome, Ireland, St. Thérèse de Lisieux, CST, CSN
During the Holy Year 1925, Archbishop Kandathil, together with Bishop Kurialacherry, went on pilgrimage to Rome, the only time he left the Indian subcontinent, to thank the Pope for establishing the Hierarchy; they also participated in the canonisation of St. Marie-Françoise-Thérèse Martin of the Infant Jesus and the Holy Face, O. C. D. [St. Thérèse de Lisieux / The little flower] on 17th May 1925 [Pius PP. XI 1925]; while at Rome, both prelates fell gravely ill, and Bishop Kurialacherry died on † 2nd June 1925 and was buried there (his remains were transferred to Changanacherry later and reïnterred on 25 Jul. 1935).
During his return, Archbishop Kandathil, together with Fr. Joseph C. Panjikaran [ഫാ. ജോസഫ് സി. പഞ്ഞിക്കാരന്], visited the newly independent Republic of Ireland and was received by the Irish President and freedom fighter Mr. William T. Cosgrave [Liam Tomás Mac Cosgair]. He also came to know at close quarters the activities of the Congregation of Christian Brothers.
The Archbishop was thus inspired to found a monastic order for Brothers, the Congregation of Saint Thérèse of Lisieux (CST Brothers) at Mookkannur [മൂക്കന്നൂര്] on 19th March 1931; Mr. Ittirah Gervasis Kulangara (1848-1935) of Mookkannur endowed the congregation with extensive lands; the Sacred Heart Orphanage for Boys [Balanagar], Mookkannur, founded in 1913, was the first duty entrusted to the congregation;
Br. Benedict Joseph Kachira, C. S. T. (4 Apr. 1910 - † 14 Oct. 2002), of Meenkunnam, Arakuzha, and Br. Arsenius Joseph Nedumpuram, C. S. T. (11 Jan. 1909 - † 3 Nov. 1990) of Nellimattam, Kothamangalam, were the first members (vestition: 23 Jun. 1933, first vows: 2 Feb. 1938, final vows: 18 May 1955). A constitution for the congregation was approved by the Archbishop on 8 Oct. 1947, and a Petit Seminary was opened at Mookkannur on 1 Jun. 1948. On 27 Dec. 1945, the Archbishop directed that the congregation also admit candidates to priesthood for the better realisation of its aims [Ernakulam Missam, Jan. 1946], thus founding the priestly wing of the congregation (CST Fathers); Basilius Thomas Panat, C. S. T. (15 Feb. 1891 - † 4 Oct. 1976) of Chalil, the then vicar of Mookkannur appointed spiritual director of the congregation in 1931, was the first priestly member (first vows: 17 May 1950, final vows: 1 Jun. 1956); Mar Dominic Joseph Kokkat, C. S. T. [L. S. T.] (b. 23 Feb. 1932) of Vaikom was the first bishop (Diocese of Gorakhpur (1984), suffragan of Agra, first vows: 17 May 1953, final vows: 4 Oct. 1960, consecrated bishop: 4 Oct. 1984).
Archbishop Kandathil, assisted by Fr. John Pinakkatt [ഫാ. ജോണ് പിണക്കാട്ടു്] and Fr. Matthew J. Mankuzhikary [ഫാ. മാത്യൂ ജെ. മങ്കുഴിക്കരി] (1909-2003), also founded the Congregation of the Sisters of Nazareth (CSN) at Paduapuram [പാദുവാപുരം], near Edakkunnu [എടക്കുന്നു്], Karukutty [കറുകുറ്റി], on 19th March 1948. Sisu Bhavan, Paduapuram, founded in 1948, was the first duty entrusted to them.
Archbishop Kandathil took an important part in spreading the devotion to St. Thérèse de Lisieux; this devotion has taken root in India and continues to flourish (cf. eg. [Bharathan 1985]). St. Alphonsa Anna Muttathupadam of the Immaculate Conception, F. C. C. [നിര്മ്മലോത്ഭവത്തിന്റെ വിശുദ്ധ അല്ഫോണ്സാ അന്ന മുട്ടത്തുപാടം, എഫ്. സി. സി.], an ardent devotee of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, and also the only St. Thomas Christian and Indian woman to be canonised by the Vatican, wrote: `In my early days I made more progress in my spiritual life than at present. I loved God more ardently. I took great care to avoid all faults. I had nothing special to mention in my first confession. I zealously aspired to become a saint. I felt that desire while I was reading the biography [Martin 1898] of St. Thérèse de Lisieux.' [Kadankavil 1949, p. 32]
Sathyadeepam [സത്യദീപം]
Archbishop Kandathil began the Catholic weekly in Malayalam, the `Sathyadeepam' [സത്യദീപം / Lamp of truth], in on 3rd July 1927, with the eminent theologian and man of letters Fr. Jacob Naduvathussery [ഫാ. ജേക്കബ് നടുവത്തുശ്ശേരി] as the editor, to disseminate the tenets of the Catholic faith and its social teaching; the weekly was so named by Fr. Joseph C. Panjikaran, a frequent contributor; the erudition of Fr. Naduvathussery in the theology of Origen Adamantius, St. Aurelius Augustinus [St. Augustine of Hippo], St. Anselm of Aosta, O. S. B., and St. Thomas Aquinas, O. P., was harnessed in defence of the Catholic faith against atheism, rationalism, materialism, positivism, communism, usury, and moral relativism. The weekly has since flourished as the mouthpiece of the Catholic Church in Kerala to this day.
The Malabar Mail [മലബാര് മെയില്], `Utharavada bharanam' [ഉത്തരവാദ ഭരണം] , Travancore Education Bill
The daily newspaper in Malayalam, `The Malabar Mail' [മലബാര് മെയില്], which he began on 9th December 1936 with the journalist Fr. Thomas Veluthedathu [ഫാ. തോമസ് വെളുത്തേടത്തു്] as the editor and the activist Mr. M. M. Varkey, Mookkenchery, and the historian Mr. M. O. Joseph, Nedumkunnam, as assistant editors, proved decisive in fostering various political struggles in the Kingdom of Travancore during the rule of Dewan Sir C. P. Ramaswami Aiyar in the decade before Indian independence, such as the `Utharavada bharanam' [ഉത്തരവാദ ഭരണം / Responsible government] struggle under the Travancore State Congress [തിരുവിതാംകൂര് സ്റ്റേറ്റ് കോംഗ്രസ്സ്] and the struggle against the Education Bill on nationalising of primary schools piloted (12 Sep. 1945) by Dewan Aiyar [വിദ്യാഭ്യാസ പ്രക്ഷോഭണം]. The paper was banned in Travancore, but continued to be published from Cochin and to be read in Travancore, and remained the principal daily of Ernakulam until his death.
Mar Louis Memorial Press, Ernakulam Missam, Ernakulam Archdiocesan Library
The Mar Louis Memorial Press was started in 1920 to support these and other publications, such as the `Ernakulam Missam', the official organ of the Archdiocese of Ernakulam, begun on 1st October 1920. He also founded the Ernakulam Archdiocesan Library in 1924.
All Kerala Catholic Congress, `Nivarthanam' [നിവര്ത്തനം], Indian National Congress
Archbishop Kandathil encouraged the expansion of the All Kerala Catholic Congress (AKCC), the Catholic Action movement in Kerala which had been founded on 30th November 1905 at Ernakulam under the Presidency of Mr. Ezhupunna Parayil Avira Varkey Tharakan [ശ്രീ എഴുപുന്ന പാറായില് അവിരാ വര്ക്കി തരകന്] (with the approval of Mar Louis Pazheparambil, the participation of the Latin Catholics, and Mr. K. W. John, Kandathil (1880-1920), the Archbishop's brother, as Secretary), and directed the clergy to extend all help to its organisers for recruiting lay members; he also granted an office (as part of the Malabar Mail building in Broadway, Ernakulam) to serve as its head-quarters.
This helped the Catholic community to play a principal part in the popular struggles in Travancore and Cochin (under the leadership of Messrs. [സര്വ്വശ്രീ] Joseph Pettah [ജോസഫ് പെട്ട], Professor of Economics and History at Murray College, Sialkot and St. Thomas College, Trichur, Elanjickal Thariath Kunjithommen [ഇലഞ്ഞിക്കല് തര്യതു് കുഞ്ഞിത്തൊമ്മന്] (28th July 1882 - † 8th October 1955), MLC from Muvattupuzha, and Cyriac Kandathil [സിറിയക്കു് കണ്ടത്തില്]) starting with the `Nivarthanam' [നിവര്ത്തനം / Abstention] agitation for proportionate representation in 1932 (under the All Travancore Joint Political Conference [അഖില തിരുവിതാംകൂര് സംയുക്ത രാഷ്ട്രീയ സമ്മേളനം]), and at length, for the rise, under the ægis of the Indian National Congress, of Catholics like Messrs. A. J. John, Anaparambil; C. J. Varkey, Chunkath; N. V. Joseph, Naduvathussery; M. M. Varkey, Mookkenchery; C. A. Ouseph; K. M. Korah, Karuvelithara; and P. T. Chacko, Pullolil, to eminence in public life. Maharani Setu Lakshmi Bayi appointed Barrister Mr. Joseph Thaliath [Thaliyath] (30th June 1883 - † 13th January 1959) (later, Chief Justice) as Judge of the High Court of Travancore (for which the Archbishop wrote her a letter of appreciation).
Propagation of the faith, Social justice
Archbishop Kandathil founded a missionary congregation of priests and laymen, the `Vedapracharasabha' [വേദപ്രചാരസഭ / Congregation for the propagation of the faith] in 1921, with Fr. Joseph C. Panjikaran [ഫാ. ജോസഫ് സി. പഞ്ഞിക്കാരന്] as director, to work for bringing people outside the fold to the Catholic faith; the activities were aimed at non-Christians as well as Christians outside the Catholic Church, and led to considerable increase in numbers for the Catholic Church of St. Thomas [Syro-Malabar Church]. According to Fr. Panjikaran: "Alone perhaps among the Eastern Catholics, the St. Thomas Christians are doing mission work among non-Christians on a large scale. In the Vatican Exhibition the pavilion marked `Riti Orientali' contains the exhibits of these Christians only, and gives a good account of the work done. The system of caste so prevalent in India made its influence felt among them as well. The high-caste Hindus were hard to convert, and as for the lower, the Christians, as descendants of the high caste, thought that by admitting the low caste converts to their community their social position and the esteem in which they were held by the high caste Hindus would suffer. But these ideas are fast changing. ... It was only within the last few years that a new impetus has been given to the propaganda and work on an organised scale carried on. The credit of this is due to the Most Rev. Mar Augustine Kandathil, Archbishop of Ernakulam. His famous pastoral on the subject has been a trumpet-call to the Christians to march to the conquest of their non-Catholic neighbours. A `Society for the Conversion of Pagans' has been started and its branches are established in nearly all the parishes. The problem of caste too has, in a way, been solved. The only church in the Archdiocese meant exclusively for the new converts was pulled down, and they were admitted to the parish churches. In some places there was opposition from the old Christians, but the bishop was adamant. Priests and educated lay opinion rallied to the help of the bishop, and the battle was won. Laymen too are showing great interest in the work, the members of the noble Parayil family being specially worthy of mention. The result of all this is has been that in 1923, the Archdiocese alone had 4089 conversions of pagans and took second rank in the list of adult conversions among all the dioceses of India, Burmah, and Ceylon. In four years over ten thousand have been fed, instructed, clothed, and baptised." [Panjikaran 1926, pp. 121-122]. Several priests from the Archdiocese of Ernakulam, such as Fr. Cyriac Vettickappally, MLC for Thodupuzha-Kunnathunad, and Fr. Jacob Naduvathussery, took part in the Vaikom Agitation (along with Barrister Mr. George Joseph Oorayil).
Reünion movement
Archbishop Kandathil was an earnest supporter of the efforts of Geevarghese Mar Ivanios Panicker, O. I. C., the Metropolitan of Bethany, and his followers in the Oriental Orthodox Church to reünite with the Catholic Church [c]; this led, at length, to the creation of the Syro-Malankara Church on 11th June 1932 [a] [Pius PP. XI 1932] with the Archdiocese of Trivandrum as its capital See and Mar Ivanios (1932-1953) as its Metropolitan, with the suffragan Diocese of Tiruvalla under Bishop Jacob Mar Theophilos Kalapurakal, O. I. C. (1932-1950); others who reünited include Joseph Mar Severios Valakuzhiyil (1937; Metropolitan of Niranam, 1932-1937), Thomas Mar Dioscoros Ottathaikal-Thervaladi (1939; Southist Jacobite Metropolitan, 1927-1939), the Indian Nationalist leader Barrister Mr. George Joseph Oorayil [ബാരിസ്റര് ശ്രീ ജോര്ജ്ജു് ജോസഫ് ഊരയില്] (1931), and Mr. M. M. Varkey, Mookkenchery (1921). Mar Ivanios was installed Archbishop on 12th March 1933 in the presence of Archbishop Kandathil.
Jubilee of St. Thomas the Apostle
Archbishop Kandathil presided over the nineteenth centennial celebrations of the arrival of St. Thomas the Apostle at Cranganore [കൊടുങ്ങല്ലൂര് / Kodungallur / Muziris, mouth of the River Periyar/Choorni [പെരിയാര്/ചൂര്ണ്ണി]] in 52 A. D. The Jubilee celebrations were held at Christ Nagar, Ernakulam, 28-31st December 1952, with about 100,000 people attending. This was the first time that the St. Thomas tradition became generally known throughout India and the world (cf. eg. [Parakunnel 1952], `St. Thomas in India', Time, 12 Jan. 1953).
The Jubilee was, respecting chiefly the interests of the Latin Hierarchy, conjoined with the 400th anniversary of the death of St. Francis de Xavier, S. J. [Chunkath 1952]. When the Vatican issued the bull appointing Mgr. Sir Norman Card. Gilroy as the Papal delegate to the celebrations, however, reference was made only to the anniversary of St. Francis de Xavier. Archbishop Kandathil, contrary to the counsel offered by some of the suffragan bishops, called off the planned celebrations and ordered the Spanish missionary Zacharias Salterian of St. Teresa, O. C. D., Professor and Vice-Rector at St. Joseph's Apostolic Seminary, Mangalapuzha, Alwaye (1912-1956), to proceed to the Vatican and get the bull revised.
`You come from Peter; and we are the sons of another Apostle Thomas', Archbishop Kandathil said addressing the Papal delegate. In a spontaneous Vatican radio broadcast on 31st December 1952 (relayed from Trivandrum), Pope Pius XII said: `Nineteen hundred years have passed since the Apostle came to India and in word and deed and utter self-sacrifice bore witness to Christ in your land. ... During the centuries that India was cut off from the West and despite many trying vicissitudes, the Christian communities formed by the Apostle conserved intact the legacy he left them, and as soon as the sea passage at the close of the fifteenth century offered a link with their fellow Christians of the West, the union with them was spontaneous. ... This apostolic lineage, beloved sons and daughters, is the proud privilege of the many among you who glory in the name of Thomas Christians and We are happy on this occasion to acknowledge and bear witness to it' [Pius PP. XII 1952]; this was the first acknowledgement by the Vatican of the apostolate of St. Thomas in South India among the St. Thomas Christians.
A few days later, on 12th January 1953, Mgr. Valerian Gracias (Archbishop of Bombay (Latin), 1950-1978) was created the first Cardinal from India (cf. eg. `First Indian Cardinal', The Hindu, 13 Jan. 1953); the telegram arrived while he was camped at Ernakulam as a participant. In his address of gratitude, the Cardinal said: `This day is historic for the Church in India-- a privileged region sanctified by the labours of one of the chosen twelve, St. Thomas, and of another great apostle, St. Francis Xavier, watered by the blood of martyrs, fertilised by the zealous apostolate of religious men and women of every nationality, and by its own indigenous clergy.'
Later in the year, on 11th November 1953, Mgr. Eugène Card. Tisserant, the Dean of the College of Cardinals (1951-1972), arrived at Ernakulam from Ortona with the remains of the right arm with which the doubting Apostle had touched the wounds of Jesus Christ to clear his doubts. The relic, after being exposed at Ernakulam, was installed on 6th December 1953 in the Mar Thoma Pontifical Shrine that was built at Kodungallur; the shrine was conferred Pontifical status by Pope Pius XII.
Contributions to Education
The Archbishop founded the Nirmala [നിര്മ്മല / Immaculate] College, Muvattupuzha, a Catholic college for men and women, dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary, on 29th June 1953 (affiliated to the University of Kerala until 1983 and to the Mahatma Gandhi University thenceforth) with Mgr. Matthew Pothanamuzhi as the first Manager (1953-1954) and Fr. Thomas Nedumkallel, Jr. as the first Principal (1953-1970). The first college in the eastern marches of Ernakulam, it proved decisive to the history of the region, and has nurtured a host of distinguished alumni.
Extension of the Hierarchy of the St. Thomas Christians
Due chiefly to the efforts of Archbishop Kandathil, the dominion of the Catholic Church of St. Thomas [Syro-Malabar Church] was extended beyond its traditional boundaries on 29th April 1955 [Pius PP. XII 1955]. The Catholic Church of St. Thomas thus gained the territories of the Dioceses of Changanacherry south of the River Pampa (Pathanamthitta, Quilon, Trivandrum), Trichur north of the River Bharathapuzha, Tellicherry (1953; Cannanore, Kasaragode), Mananthavady (1973; Wayanad, Nilgiris), Palghat (1974; Palghat), Thamarassery (1986; Calicut, Malappuram), Thuckalay (1996; Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli [W. of Tuticorin, S. of Madura]), Belthangady (1999; Coorg, South Canara (Mangalore), Udupi), Bhadravathi (2007; Chikmagalore, Shimoga [S. of Gokarnam, N. Canara, Bellary]), Mandya (2010; Mysore, Hassan, Mandya, Chamarajanagar [W. of Bangalore, S. of Tumkur]), and Ramanathapuram (Ramnad) (2010; Coimbatore, Tirupur, Erode, Karur [W. of Madura, Trichinopoly, Salem]); the territorial extent of the Hierarchy of the St. Thomas Christians [Syro-Malabar Hierarchy] remains so to this day (the Dioceses of Kothamangalam (1956), Kanjirapally (1977), Irinjalakuda (1978), and Idukki (2003) were carved out later from the original territory).
This immediately enabled the suffragan Diocese of Tellicherry to minister to the substantial number of migrant [കുടിയേറ്റ] Catholics in Northern Kerala (erstwhile British Malabar). The Diocese of Tellicherry had been erected earlier on 31st December 1953 [Pius PP. XII 1953] with initial territory the same as the Latin Diocese of Calicut, and Bishop Mar Sebastian Valloppilly (1955-1989) serving as Administrator-Apostolic (1953-1955).
The suffragan Diocese of Palai was erected (from territory of the Diocese of Changanacherry) under Bishop Mar Sebastian Vayalilkalapura (Vayalil) (1950-1981) on 25th July 1950 [Pius PP. XII July 1950].
Liturgy of the St. Thomas Christians
When the Vatican sought to establish a completely Chaldæan liturgy for the Catholic Church of St. Thomas [Syro-Malabar Church] in 1955, Archbishop Kandathil declined to give his assent: `We are pure Indians, born and brought-up in India. We are racially Indians, a good part of our forefathers having been converted from high-caste Hindus of Malabar by St. Thomas. Hence we are known as St. Thomas Christians. From the time of St. Thomas, our people were having their liturgy in their own national language, except perhaps some essential parts in Syriac, introduced by St. Thomas. When the St. Thomas Christians had no priests to perform their liturgical functions due to persecution and such other adverse circumstances, our people were only participating in the liturgical functions performed by the Syrian priests who came to Malabar towards the middle of the fourth century. Still our people remained pure Indians saying their prayers in their own tongue. ... The Syro-Malabar rite, as distinct from the pure Chaldæan rite, is about three and a half centuries old, and has been recognised as a distinct rite. Therefore we want to keep up the independence and the specific character of our rite by all means. The Latin liturgy has not failed to make convenient adaptations and modifications throughout the centuries. We want a reformation in our liturgy that will help it to be living, dynamic, and progressive.' [Kandathil 1955] [d]
Archbishop Kandathil began the steps for establishing the use of the vernacular Malayalam in the liturgy instead of the Syriac that was then in use (this was implemented in 1962):
"The introduction of vernacular in the liturgy will be, no doubt, greatly appreciated by all. ... The Malayalam language used in the pontifical could be improved and made more classical. Already there is the complaint that the Malayalam used by the Christians is very poor and antiquated. ... The educated Hindus ... call our language `Mappillai Malayalam', i. e. Christian Malayalam. If in future too we continue to use poor and antiquated language for worship, it will surely tend to lessen the devotion of people. The educated may even be tempted to keep away from the divine worship on account of this.
The Latins in Malabar too may soon have the vernacular in their liturgy. Undoubtedly they will see to it that the language they use is modern and attractive. We, the Orientals alone, who are mostly high class people and in general better educated, will lag behind and will be an object of contempt and derision.
The Jacobite Christians of Malabar, it may be noted, had set up a committee of experts in Malayalam language including even Hindus, in order to formulate their liturgical prayers in an elegant and beautiful language. The Syro-Malankara rite also makes use of the same prayers to a great extent.
We feel therefore that it is good for us also to make our liturgical prayers according to the classical style of the Malayalam language. This will be appreciated by all. Some years ago the Bishops, both Syrian and Latin, had appointed a commission to see to the improvement of our language in the prayers. But it did not continue the work for various reasons.
He also pointed out the dire need to shorten the prayers of the mass, the canonical hours, and other liturgical services: `The Latin ceremonies are even now comparatively shorter than ours. We learn that they are going to be shortened still more. Thus our churches will be deserted. People will lose their enthusiasm and love for Syriac liturgy. It will indeed be painful for us, and no less for Your Eminence. Our priests in charge of souls, unlike the monks remaining in the monasteries, are also overburdened with various pastoral duties. They are much more than in former times. ... Therefore, unless the mass and the other ceremonies be short, our priests and people will be put to great difficulties and their piety and devotion will be affected unfavourably.' [Kandathil 1955]
Appearance, residence, and health
In appearance, he was of modest stature and slight build, and of a somewhat darker complexion. His voice was markedly deep, powerful, and resonant. A portrait in oil paint by Artist Mr. P. J. Cherian, Puthanangady [ആര്ട്ടിസ്റ്റു് ശ്രീ പി. ജെ. ചെറിയാന്, പുത്തനങ്ങാടി] is installed at Central Hall, Archbishop's House, Ernakulam. A bust is installed at the charter house of the CST in Mookkannur.
During his time as a prelate, he lived at the Archbishop's House, Ernakulam, for most of the year. He used to spend the summer at one of two archdiocesan bungalows at Chengal [ചെങ്ങല്] (near Kalady [കാലടി], on the bank of the River Periyar/Choorni [പെരിയാര്/ചൂര്ണ്ണി]) and Devicolam [ദേവികുളം].
Mr. Kunjipailo Veliath [ശ്രീ കുഞ്ഞിപ്പൈലോ വെളിയത്തു്] served as his valet for four decades (from his time in Koratty until his death).
He kept excellent health until his visit to Rome in 1925. The debilitating effects of the illness continued to be felt throughout his life. He continued, however, to be in full possession of his vigour until the day of his sudden illness and unexpected death.
Commemoration
Archbishop Kandathil lies buried at the main altar (funeral: 12 Jan. 1956) in the Cathedral Basilica of St. Mary [Our Lady of Ports], Ernakulam [Founded: 1112] (though he had wished to be buried at the steps). A portrait in oil paint by Artist Mr. P. J. Cherian, Puthanangady [ആര്ട്ടിസ്റ്റു് ശ്രീ പി. ജെ. ചെറിയാന്, പുത്തനങ്ങാടി] is installed at Central Hall, Archbishop's House, Ernakulam. His patrimonial estate in Chempu was bequeathed by him in 1942 to the Congregation of Saint Thérèse of Lisieux (CST) for endowing the St. Stephen's Ashramam [Monastery] (1942) and Balasadanam [Boys's Orphanage] (1954), Mathumkal [മത്തുങ്കല്], Chempu. A bust is installed at the charter house of the CST in Mookkannur. (The Shrine of St. Thomas (in front of the Cathedral Basilica of St. Mary), the souvenir of his episcopal silver jubilee (1936), was pulled down after having stood for six decades.)
Some institutions devoted to his memory are: Mar Augustine Memorial High School, Koratty (1945); Mar Augustine Golden Jubilee Memorial Hospital (Edapally, Mookkannur, Chempu; 1951); Mar Augustine's High School, N. Thuravoor (1982); Mar Augustine Silver Jubilee Memorial Home for the Destitute, Perumanoor (1982); and Mar Augusthinose College, Ramapuram (1993).
Some important works on him are those by Fr. Joseph Mavumkal [Mavumkal 1936], Fr. George Thalian [Thalian 1961], Mgr. Thomas Moothedan [Moothedan 1972], and his own unpublished chronicle [Kandathil].
The Mar Augustine Memorial Lisie Hospital, Kaloor, Ernakulam, was begun in 1954 in accordance with his vision and plans. The hospital was officially founded in his memory on the first anniversary of his death, according to the wishes of clergy and laity, bears witness to his devotion to St. Thérèse de Lisieux, and continues to provide succour to the destitute of Ernakulam:
These events are narrated in the travelogue [Paremmakkal 1936] concerning the eight-year long voyage of the Malpan from Kerala to Rome and back (1778-1786); the voyage had been undertaken for the purpose of removing obstacles to receiving Iype Mar Thoma VI (Iype Mar Dionysius I), the Oriental Orthodox Metropolitan (1772-1808) and lineal heir to Archdeacon Thomas Parambil (Pakalomattam / Palliveettil / Panamkuzhackal) [Thomas de Campo], into the Catholic Church; the Malpan also submitted a petition to the Vatican for the cause of the canonisation of Martyr Devasahayam Pillai.
The finances for the voyage were from Mr. Thachil Thariath Matthoo Tharakan [ശ്രീ തച്ചില് തര്യതു് മാത്തു തരകന്] (1741 - † 26th മേടം 1814) of Alangad, North Kuthiathode, collaborator of General Eustache Benoît de Lannoy [വലിയ കപ്പിത്താന് / Great Captain] (1715 - † 1 June 1777) in building the Travancore lines [നെടുംകോട്ട], trader at the port of Purakkad [പുറക്കാടു്], a founder (with Dewan Mr. Kesava Pillai) of the town and port of Alleppey [ആലപ്പുഴ] (and a resident of Thathampally with his private chapel at Korthassery), exporter of timber to the British Admiralty during the Napoleonic wars, the financier to the Kingdom of Travancore under Maharaja Karthika Thirunal Rama Varma (who built him the Forane Church of St. Anne, Pettah, Trivandrum (Latin)), the counsellor [ഉപദേഷ്ടാവു്] and finance minister [മുളകുമടിശീല കാര്യക്കാര്] (26 Apr. - 20 Jun., 1799) of the Kingdom of Travancore under Maharaja Avittam Thirunal Balarama Varma (18 Feb. 1798 - 7 Nov. 1810), the deviser of progressive taxation in Travancore (in contrast to the previous regressive one), and the founder of a lazar house at North Pallippuram [Palliport], near Cranganore.
The death of Mar Joseph Kariattil was to stall by more than a century both the achievement of sovereignty for the St. Thomas Christians (attained in 1923) and the reünion of St. Thomas Christians in the Oriental Orthodox Church with the Catholic Church (partially attained in 1932).
[b] Particulars of the early episcopal lineage of the St. Thomas Christians are lost to history. In later centuries, East-Syriac/Edessan Chaldæan [Assyrian] Metropolitans governed the St. Thomas Christians from Cranganore [കൊടുങ്ങല്ലൂര് / Kodungallur / Muziris]; the last such Metropolitan, Mar Abraham (1569-1597), moved his seat to Angamaly [അങ്കമാലി] and died in 1597 after appointing Geevarghese of the Cross, his Archdeacon (1593-1637), as Administrator-Apostolic of the Archdiocese (1597-1599).
The Synod convoked (1599) at Diamper [ഉദയമ്പേരൂര് / Udayamperoor] by the Archbishop of Goa, Dom Aleixo de Menezes, O. S. A. (1595-1609), subjugated the Archdiocese of Cranganore to the Padroado Archdiocese of Goa; thenceforth, European (mostly Portuguese) Jesuits, beginning with Mgr. Francisco Ros, S. J. (1599-1624) (who governed from Kottakkavu/Kottakkayal / കോട്ടയ്ക്കാവു്/കോട്ടക്കായല് [North Parur/North Paravoor / വടക്കന് പറവൂര്]), were Archbishops of Cranganore (governing in later times from Puthenchira [പുത്തഞ്ചിറ] / Pookkad [പൂക്കാടു്]); the only exceptions were Mgr. Paul of Thomas of Aquinum and Almeida, O. P. (1821-1823), and Mar Joseph Kariattil [കരിയാറ്റില് മാര് ഔസേപ്പ്] (1783-1786) who, dying before his installation, appointed Paremmakkal Thoma Kathanar [പാറേമ്മാക്കല് തോമ്മാ കത്തനാര്] as Administrator-Apostolic (Governador) of the Archdiocese of Cranganore (1787-1799); the latter governed first from Angamaly, later from Vadayar [വടയാര്], and finally from Ramapuram [രാമപുരം]; Sankoorikal Geevarghese Malpan [ശങ്കൂരിക്കല് ഗീവര്ഗീസ് മല്പാന്] served briefly as Administrator-Apostolic after him (1800-1801) before the See fell into disuse and was finally suppressed in 1886.
With the Coonan [കൂനന്] Cross Oath at Mattancherry [മട്ടാഞ്ചേരി] (1653), in the background of the struggle between the Protestant Dutch and the Catholic Portuguese for control of Kerala, the Archdeacon Thomas Parambil (Pakalomattam / Palliveettil / Panamkuzhackal) [Thomas de Campo] (1637-1673) and his followers rejected the authority of the Jesuit Archbishops of Cranganore (then, Francisco Garcia, S. J. (1641-1659)) and, at length, a minor portion of the dissenters (called the `Puthenkuttukar' [പുത്തന്കൂറ്റുകാര് / people of the new allegiance] seceded to the West-Syriac/Antiochene Oriental Orthodox/Monophysite [Jacobite] Church; in this extremity, the Propaganda Fide Congregation in Rome erected the Vicariate of Malabar in 1659 (later renamed as the Vicariate of Verapoly [വരാപ്പുഴ] in 1709); thenceforth, European Carmelites, beginning with Mgr. Joseph de Sebastiani of St. Mary, O. C. D. (1659-1663), were Vicars-Apostolic of Verapoly; the only exceptions were Mgr. Raphael de Figueredo Salgado (1687-1695), and Mar Chandy Parambil (Pakalomattam / Palliveettil / Panamkuzhackal) [പറമ്പില് മാര് ചാണ്ടി / Alexander de Campo] (1663-1687), one of the four councillors to Archdeacon Thomas Parambil, who governed from Vechur [വെച്ചൂര്] and was so appointed when the Dutch expelled the European missionaries from Kerala; the latter appointed Parambil (Pakalomattam / Palliveettil / Panamkuzhackal) Matthai Kathanar [Matthew de Campo] as Archdeacon (1678-1706); Palackal Thoma Malpan [പാലയ്ക്കല് തോമ്മാ മല്പാന്] (1808-1816), Porukara Thoma Kathanar [പോരൂക്കര തോമ്മാ കത്തനാര്] (1828-1831), and Mangalath Chandy Kathanar [മംഗലത്തു് ചാണ്ടി കത്തനാര്] (1831-1844), served as Secretaries-in-charge of the St. Thomas Christians to the Vicar-Apostolic of Verapoly; Chavara Kuriakose Elias of the Holy Family, T. O. C. D. [ക. നി. മു. സ. ചാവറ കുരിയാക്കോസ് ഏലിയാ ദ് തുഹമ്മാ കന്തീസാ] served as Vicar-General of Verapoly for the St. Thomas Christians (1861-1871); Mgr. Marcelline Antony Berardi of St. Teresa, O. C. D., served as Coädjutor of Verapoly for the St. Thomas Christians (1877-1887).
Separate Vicariates were erected for the St. Thomas Christians on 20th May 1887 (under Mgr. Charles Lavigne, S. J. [F. C. C. (E); S. B.] and Mgr. Adolph E. Medlycott [S. T.] appointed on 13th September 1887), and three Indian Vicars-Apostolic were appointed on 11th August 1896; one of them, Mar Louis Pazheparambil, Vicar-Apostolic of Ernakulam (1896-1919), known in religion as Aloysius Pareparambil of St. Matthew, T. O. C. D., had been among the seven monks (called the `Ezhu vyakulangal' [ഏഴു് വ്യാകുലങ്ങള് / seven dolours]) expelled (1875) from the Carmelite Order of the St. Thomas Christians (T. O. C. D.) by the then Vicar-Apostolic of Verapoly, Mgr. Leonard Mellano of St. Louis, O. C. D. (1868-1897), for writing to the Pope asking for an Indian bishop to rule their church; later he repeatedly petitioned the Vatican for the founding of the Hierarchy of the St. Thomas Christians [Syro-Malabar Hierarchy].
Another vicariate, Kottayam, was founded by Pope St. Pius X for the Southist [തെക്കുംഭാഗര് / Suddhist / Knanaya] Christians on 29th August 1911 [St. Pius PP. X 1911] with Mar Matthew Makil [മാക്കില് മാര് മത്തായി] (1896-1914) as its first Vicar-Apostolic. The Southist Christians are the endogamous descendants of the Christians who immigrated under Mr. Kinayi Thoma [ശ്രീ ക്നായി തോമ്മാ / Mr. Kinayi Thommen / Mr. Thomas of Cana] and Bishop Uraha Mar Ouseph from the Near East to Cranganore in 345 A. D.; this immigration is recorded in the copper plate [ചേപ്പേട്] (cf. [Ros 1604] [Medlycott 1913]) awarded to Mr. Kinayi Thoma by the King Cocurangon, now lost.
[c] Shortly after Mar Ivanios professed the Catholic faith at Quilon on 20th September 1930 [Panjikaran 1930] and visited him at Ernakulam, Archbishop Kandathil wrote to Paul Wattson, S. A., editor of `The Lamp': `The monks led a very regular life. They completely abstained from meat and fish and lived only on vegetables. They dressed in Hindu sanyasi (kavi) robes [the saffron garb of the Hindu holy man]. They were self-sacrificing, pious, and learned, and devoted themselves to infusing some spiritual life in the Jacobite Church, which for centuries has been torn by all sorts of dissension and litigations. They were greatly esteemed by the people. Mar Ivanios was telling me the other day that when he was a simple priest he sometimes spent the whole night hearing confessions. To raise the standard of female education, Mar Ivanios took some Jacobite girls to Barisol, Calcutta, and put them up with the High Church Protestant sisters. In due course they returned to Malabar and started the Order of Bethany sisters. Some of these are highly educated and hold university degrees. They conduct schools, maintain orphanages, and have a press of their own, the Bethany Printing House at Tiruvalla. Mar Ivanios has been their chaplain all through.'
[d] The views of Archbishop Kandathil on the liturgy of the St. Thomas Christians [Kandathil 1955] were quoted and interpreted by his successor to the see of Ernakulam: "Our forefathers were `Hindu-Christians', having been converted from Hinduism, and not `Judæo-Christians' like the first fruits of the apostolic labours of St. Peter. Just imagine how vigourously St. Paul resisted St. Peter's attempt to impose the law of circumcision on the non-Jewish converts. We have no traces of the liturgy used by St. Thomas in India, but we can presume that it was an indigenous form of worship blending the message of the gospel with the spiritual patrimony of the new converts, and using idioms and symbolisms intelligible to them. With the advent of the Syrian bishops from abroad, bringing with them a developed Chaldæan liturgy, the liturgical seedling planted by St. Thomas must have been neglected, if not choked. Our forefathers succeeded in Indianising to some extent the imported liturgy. In essentials it remained Semitic. That is why, when the question of restoring the Chaldæan liturgy was proposed by Rome in 1955, my illustrious predecessor Archbishop Kandathil was unwilling to give his concurrence." Mar Joseph Card. Parecattil: `Adaptation and the future of Christianity in India', 1972, in `The St. Thomas Christian Encyclopædia of India', Vol. 2, George Menachery (Ed.), Ollur, Kerala, India, 2000, pp. 186-191.
"The long and thought-provoking reply of Mar Augustine Kandathil has been published in full [Kandathil 1955]. Mar Augustine, a scholarly historian and progressive thinker who loved the church intensely, was ever pleading for its progress and ever sending repeated representations to Rome for enlarging the scope of missionary activities of our church beyond the confines of Kerala. He had his objections for letting our young missionary aspirants join foreign religious orders. He had clearly stated his views that the revival of the Chaldæan rite would be a setback for our progress. He had made it clear in the letter that we were truly Indians and that the Chaldæan rite and the Syriac language were imposed on us during the middle of the fourth century. ... [One] serious problem [arises] for us in the mission regions outside Kerala. What right have we to go amidst a people totally alien to the religious rituals of Edessa or Kerala bearing the designation Syro-Malabar rite and hold up to them a [Chaldæan] culture? ...
No one can deny that the Chaldæan rite originated in Kerala due to the endeavour of the priests and high priests among the immigrants who colonised here in the fourth century. It should be remembered that the Synod of Seleucia held in 410 had resolved that the Chaldæan rite should be established wherever they colonised. ... As the Chaldæans themselves were linked with St. Thomas, it was easy for them to integrate themselves with the St. Thomas Christians. But what was their contribution to the Church in Kerala till the sixteenth century? How far did they succeed in bettering or enriching the spiritual life of the Christians here? These are matters for investigation. There is no information whatever of their having raised any son of the soil to the bishop's rank carrying the fullness of the priesthood. At least one native bishop, Alexander de Campo, was consecrated by the Latin missionaries. One can only wonder where we would have been if the Chaldæans were not forced out by the Portuguese at that time. ...
The Syro-Malabar rite, different only slightly from the Chaldæan rite, was in force from the sixteenth century onwards. ... In a letter dated 25 Sep. 1897 from the Holy father (Leo XIII) to Mar Louis Pazheparambil... it was specifically pointed out that in view of the appointment of native bishops to the Syro-Malabar church, the efforts of some people to relate or link this church with the [Chaldæan] Patriarch are not only unwholesome but even insubordination to the proper authorities. In 1938 when it was known that there were some movements at the higher levels of church administration to revive the ancient Chaldæan rite,... Mar Augustine Kandathil and Mar James Kalacherry... wrote to Rome expressing their displeasure at the move. They stated therein that `the Syro-Malabar rite has already been confirmed by the Holy see' and in support of their contention forwarded a copy of the letter of the Holy father (Leo XIII). ...
Some people have tried to create a feeling that only a few bishops in recent times have `given their blood and sweat' to revive and reconstruct the liturgy and that their predecessors of the older generation were lazy and indifferent and never worried about these matters. But a scrutiny of the historical records will show that the converse is true. Till 1896, the main concern of the local church was for procuring the rights for self government and native bishops. When that was achieved, our forefathers engaged themselves in the development of educational, social welfare, and spiritual works. The native bishops were zealously devoted to the updating of the liturgical life also. ... The issues of the Ernakulam Missam of Dec. 1975 and Mar. 1976 contain a series of historical documents. They include 18 annual reports of the conferences of the Syro-Malabar bishops from 1924 to 1953. The reports are preserved in the archives of the Archbishop's House. It cannot be said with certainty whether other reports were not written or have been lost. ... In the available reports there are a number of resolutions dealing with liturgical reforms. ... The permission of Rome does not appear to have been sought at all. Perhaps that was the practice at the time. ... From 1924 to 1956 the Syro-Malabar bishops's conference was very much concerned with the timely renewal and adaptation of our mass. The use of the translation from the Peshitta for the readings in the missal, strict observance of the rubric as laid down in the ordo, combining the portions forming the ordinary of the mass, prepositioning the commune sanctorum and proprium sanctorum, and approval of the missal as printed at Mannanam were among the subjects discussed in the conference. Appropriate decisions were taken by the liturgy committee. ...
In 1930, a liturgy committee was appointed. Mgr. Thomas Nedumkallel was the President and Convener. Other members were Fr. John Alapatt (Trichur), Fr. Jacob Pallikkunnel (Kottayam), Fr. Andrew Kalappura (Changanacherry), and Gabriel Pulickal [Pulickan] of St. Joseph, T. O. C. D. They were to prepare a draft for all liturgical services and rituals and submit them to the bishops's conference to be held in Nov. 1931. The bishops were to supply them with matter concerning high mass, solemn high mass, and the raza, within six months. ... The bishops's conference held on 17 Nov. 1931 discussed the report furnished by the above committee and took appropriate decisions on their recommendations regarding mass and communion on holy saturday, reduction in length of the responses of the acolyte during mass, baptism, and the funeral services of priests. Another liturgical committee constituted in 1941 studied the form and rituals of solemn high mass for the living and the dead. In 1944 a three member committee was formed ... for systematising the rituals of high mass and for reducing the length of the funeral services of the laity and priests.
One of the resolutions passed in 1924 states that efforts should be made to obtain speedy approval from Rome for the Pontifical submitted to them. A resolution passed in Feb. 1929 deals elaborately with the steps for getting a full translation of the Pontifical. It decided to approve whatever had been translated by Bishops Menachery and Pazheparambil and to request the Prior General of the Carmelites to entrust the translation of the remaining portion to Fr. Gabriel. It requested the Archbishop to complete the work within two months. ... It is on record that on 26 Oct. 1929 the report to the Delegate Apostolic on the Syriac translation of the Pontifical was read out to all the bishops and a decision taken to send an explanatory note on the translation to the Delegate Apostolic. ... Even before these activities were taken by the bishops jointly in 1928, Mar Augustine Kandathil had written to the Chaldæan Patriarch of Basra for a transcribed copy of the Chaldæan Pontifical. ... Not only the Pontifical but other Chaldæan liturgical texts were procured by him then. The observations of Fr. Gabriel ... on the Chaldæan Pontifical and its translation by Bishops Kariattil, Pazheparambil, and Menachery, also deserve our careful study. It is true that the Syriac translation of the Latin Pontifical was not approved by Rome. It is difficult to say why... It may be that the translation was defective. Or it may be because it belonged to another rite. Opposition was raised against using the Latin Pontifical by Chaldæans. It was argued that it was not suitable for the Chaldæan rite. The Roman Pandits like Fr. Cyril Korolevsky and Dom Placid de Meester, O. S. B., did not hesitate to advise the concerned authorities that `it was gravely sinful even to help in getting the translation recognised.' In the light of these, Pope Pius XI did not approve the Syriac translation of the Latin Pontifical. There are those who suspect the Chaldæan experts who examined the Syriac translation as parties to the rejection. They were bent on our accepting their own Chaldæan liturgical texts to perpetuate their domination over us. Some Keralites were also of this view. But with the erection of the Syro-Malabar Hierarchy, it became evident that we were not going to accept the supremacy and domination of the Chaldæan patriarchate over us. It is not surprising that they and their admirers in Kerala continued to try to reëstablish their domination at least in matters of liturgy. ...
On 6 May 1954 Cardinal Tisserant informed Mar Augustine Kandathil that a commission was appointed to set right the liturgical matters of the Syro-Malabar Church and that it had already started functioning. The names of the members of the commission were not communicated. It remains a sad truth that in the appointment of a commission whose decisions would vitally affect the fortunes of our church, our bishops were not even consulted. Though the names of the members are not revealed in any of the letters from the congregation, it is known that the members were: Alphonse Raes, S. J. of the Latin rite from Belgium; Fr. Cyril Korolevsky of the Byzantine rite; Placid Podipara of St. Joseph, T. O. C. D. of the Syro-Malabar rite. A Chaldæan priest Fr. Emmanuel Delly (Mar Emmanuel III Card. Delly, Chaldæan Patriarch, 2003) was to help the commission. ... Any commission appointed without knowledge or consent of the Syro-Malabar Hierarchy cannot and does not represent the Syro-Malabar Hierarchy or Church. I feel that such a liturgy commission should have included at least a member from Kerala who has had experiences of the pastoral life in Kerala, who could respond to the emotions and sentiments of the fold in Kerala. There are many dimensions to the form of popular worship, liturgical, historical, biblical, theological, and pastoral. Therefore there is need for expert advice in formulating it-- experts in the structure of liturgy, its history, the scriptures, theology, who have had experience in real life situations. I am not questioning the competence of the Roman experts in their respective fields. But they are not omniscient. They would have had their limitations which could not but have cast their shadows on their overall performance. ...
In 1955, Rome forwarded to our bishops... a [printed] Latin text of the mass revised by the liturgical committee in Rome, said to be approved, and [a cyclostyled text in Malayalam] of some portions of a new pontifical mass [for the consecration of bishops], to all Syro-Malabar bishops for their comments. ... In the text for the mass, the anaphoras of Nestorius and Theodore of Mopsuestia, whom the Catholics had considered as heretics, were also included. The pontifical as sent did not contain the full translation of the Syriac pontifical, sent to us later. Till this time all questions of liturgy were discussed by the bishop's conference. But this time the bishops were individually and separately contacted. Separate replies were called for from each prelate. Why such a deviation was adopted provides food for thought. This diplomatic approach has been continued later also. ... All the bishops individually replied that our rite was Syro-Malabar and not Chaldæan. The letters were rather strongly worded. ... There was a surprising uniformity and agreement in the replies sent separately by all the bishops. ... None of the bishops welcomed a complete restoration of the Chaldæan liturgy. All of them were agreed on shortening the mass. ... The unanimous view of the bishops was that ours was the Syro-Malabar rite and there was no need for reforming or reconstructing it. Among the replies [of the Syro-Malabar bishops], the one which is most significant and dealt with the question in all its aspects was the one from Mar Augustine Kandathil, a profound historian and the exalted head of the Syro-Malabar Church. ... Surely the letter reveals the farsightedness and prophetic vision of the aged high priest. It reflects a dynamism that challenges any youth of today. ...
This bold and united voice of opposition of the pastors who knew what their sheep wanted, how their spiritual hunger should be met, how they should be shielded from straying through sandy tracts like the Arabian deserts, and how foolish and irresponsible it would be to lead new sheep to antiquated pastures, resounded in the Oriental Congregation. The congregation therefore temporarily shelved their secret manœuvres to impose the Chaldæan liturgy on the Church in Malabar. These efforts lay dormant till the death of Mar Augustine Kandathil spearheading the opposition.
Mar Augustine Kandathil, the leader and the life-giving source of the Syro-Malabar Church, passed away on † 10 Jan. 1956. ... It is heard that one of the actors in Rome in this drama of liturgy renewal spontaneously reacted to the news saying: `Now I can implement my liturgy.' ... Soon [after Archbishop Kandathil's death], Fr. Placid [Podipara of St. Joseph, T. O. C. D.] came to Kerala with a letter from the Oriental Congregation and approached all the local bishops... in an attempt to get their consent for liturgy renewal. ... Their replies... confirmed their earlier stand on the preservation of the Syro-Malabar rite. ... Even though the other bishops toned down their replies compared to their earlier stand-- possibly due to the personal intervention of Fr. Placid-- none of them welcomed complete Chaldæanisation. The bishops of Palai and Kottayam merely reverted to their old replies and avoided further comments. ... Some of the bishops handed over their reply to Fr. Placid in person. Most of them replied directly to Rome. ...
Mar Augustine Kandathil has recorded in his diary [Kandathil] on 11th November 1953 a note which reveals the difference between the views or stands taken by the hierarchy and Fr. Placid. The note deals with the interview of Cardinal Tisserant with the Syro-Malabar bishops. The entry reads: `After some time the Cardinal called to the hall the Syrian bishops belonging to the two rites. Fr. Placid was also there. The Cardinal spoke about our liturgy in its old forms and the need for people's participation in it. The bishops expressed the need for including Malayalam translation of the prayers in the missal, as well as for shortening the duration of the mass. I mentioned that Fr. Placid is a stubborn adherent of the ancient liturgy. We all represented our case for extending our jurisdiction to Calicut and the south. The Cardinal called for a list of the people involved.' Of the bishops who attended that meeting, I am the lone survivor. I think that the gulf between Fr. Placid and the hierarchy on the matter of liturgy started widening since then. Fr. Placid went to Rome soon after. Everybody knows as a matter of fact he stayed in Rome as a consultant to the Oriental Congregation and exerted his strong personal influence on the question of the renewal of liturgy. ...
On 4 Aug. 1953 the bishops's conference appointed another committee to translate the liturgical prayers for the mass and the sacraments. Mar Thomas Tharayil was the chairman. The other members were Fr. Placid, Fr. Matthew Vadakel, Mgr. Matthew Thekkanatt, Dr. Sebastian Cherayath, and Dr. Thomas Moothedan. They were to ensure that the translation preserved the identity of the Syro-Malabar rite intact. They were to submit a report at least before 1 Oct. 1953. It is said that the committee did not function due to the non-coöperation of Fr. Placid. It must have been so, because the ultimate goal of Fr. Placid was the reïnstatement of the mass and sacraments in the Chaldæan rite. But this goal was not in harmony with the desires of the people, priests, and the hierarchy. What they intensely desired for centuries to restore, even by `shedding of blood', was autonomy for the church in Kerala, and not liturgy. The historical records published by Mar Louis Pazheparambil [Pareparambil 1920] bear this out. ...
It was evident that a situation in which the prelates of the Syro-Malabar Church were ignored or not duly recognised prevailed in certain quarters. I came to know that such an attitude existed more at the Damascene College [Rome] where many of our priests from Kerala were residing. I also felt the vested interests of some Keralites were more responsible for developing such an attitude than those of foreign church officials. ...
There is no doubt that Cardinal Tisserant was a man who loved the Syrian Church in Kerala. He must have believed that his efforts in reviving the Chaldæan rite would be a great service and a manifestation of his love and concern for the Syro-Malabar Church. But the reaction of the Syro-Malabar bishops to the draft of the revised text he had sent them opened his eyes. He was realistic enough to concede that it would be imprudent to disturb pastoral life. So he did not insist on any revival. But with the death of Mar Augustine Kandathil and the emergence of relaxed reactions among the Syro-Malabar bishops under the influence of Fr. Placid, the Cardinal had second thoughts on revival. He gradually yielded to the pressures working on him. ...
On 27 May 1957, a critically decisive plenary session of all the Cardinals of the Oriental Congragation was held to take final decisions on the Syro-Malabar mass and the Pontifical. ... There was no one in the meeting to explain or plead for, or to justify ideas and aspirations of the Syro-Malabar bishops. The only member of the Syro-Malabar Church present there was Fr. Placid and he was in the opposite camp. ... The majority of them had no personal knowledge and perhaps no concern too for the Syro-Malabar Church and its future. In such a situation an ex parte decision anyway was easy. That is how the texts of the mass and the Pontifical were approved, not considering at all the requests of the Syro-Malabar bishops to modernise and shorten the services and for a committee to make an on-the-spot study in Kerala. On 26 Jun. 1957, the then reigning pontiff Pope Pius XII granted formal recognition to the revised or revived texts. I do not know whether His Holiness had been appraised of both sides of the problem. In his famous encyclical on liturgy `Mediator Dei' [Pius PP. XII 1947] the Holy father has reasoned out that mere revival is objectionable. If a revised text conforming to the wishes of the shepherds who knew the flock intimately had been presented to the Holy father, he would surely have granted recognition to it. I believe that if that was done, much of the later dissensions and troubles would not have arisen. ...
One should not stop at the fourth century in an honest search for the roots of the sound traditions of our liturgy. ... We should go farther back to the early days of Christianity in Kerala in the first century and to the Indian traditions amidst which it took shape. Possibly we can discover nothing in those dark periods. It is not really necessary to search for them today. We have to found our rite and rituals amidst contemporary background. But then, any picture can be painted only on a canvas. It is this canvas that we are seeking in Chaldæan liturgy which is the fundamental basis of the Syro-Malabar liturgy. ... It is a futile exercise to engage in debates and controversies on our original liturgy and its exclusiveness or identity. Historians are not agreed, nor are they constantly of the same view in matters connected with them. We have seen many of them changing their views from time to time. What is practically important and of primary concern are the nature of our present liturgy and how our forms of worship can be made more useful and attractive to our people. It is good to remember always that God is more pleased with our lives than with our rites.
cf. also Francis Kanichikattil, T. O. C. D.: `Question of ancestral traditions: a crisis in the Syro-Malabar Church', Asvattha, n. 20, July 2009. Some Chaldæan Patriarchs who have attempted to establish their domination over the St. Thomas Christians are Mar Yohannan VIII Hormizd (1783-1838), Mar Joseph VI Audo (1847-1878) [Pius PP. IX 1872], and Mar Emmanuel III Card. Delly (2003).
`And in the Church of Ognissanti in Florence, in competition with Sandro di Botticello, he painted a S. Jerome in fresco (which is now beside the door that leads to the choir), surrounding him with an infinite number of instruments and books, such as are used by the learned. The friars having occasion to remove the choir from the place where it stood, this picture, together with that of Sandro di Botticello, has been bound round with irons and transported without injury into the middle of the church, at the very time when these Lives are being printed for the second time.'
-- Giorgio Vasari on Domenico Ghirlandaio in `Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects'.
`In the tramezzo of the Ognissanti, by the door that leads into the choir, he painted for the Vespucci a S. Augustine in fresco, with which he took very great pains, seeking to surpass all the painters of his time, and particularly Domenico Ghirlandaio, who had made a S. Jerome on the other side; and this work won very great praise, for in the head of that Saint he depicted the profound meditation and acute subtlety that are found in men of wisdom who are ever concentrated on the investigation of the highest and most difficult matters. This picture, as was said in the Life of Ghirlandaio has this year (1564) been removed safe and sound from its original position.'
-- Giorgio Vasari on Sandro Botticelli in `Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects'.
`Although he suffered from leprosy from childhood, yet he strenuously preserved the frontiers of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and won a remarkable victory over Saladin at Mont Gisard [25th November 1177], and as long as he lived, he was victorious.'
-- Mgr. Sicard of Cremona, Chronicon, P. L., 213, col. 512. (encomium on King Baldwin IV.)