|
SIGMOD 2008
2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data
June 9-12 2008
Vancouver
Canada
|
Aggregates over review questions.
Min Is this paper relevant to the Industrial Track? I.e., is it about commercial information management software, or about industrial-strength prototypes of information management software in widespread use? | 0 |
Avg Overall rating | 2.00 |
Spread Overall rating | 4 |
Review: 1 |
Reviewer:
| Jan Pedersen |
Email:
| jpederse@yahoo-inc.com |
Organization:
| Yahoo! Inc |
Review:
| |
| Question | Response |
1 | Is this paper relevant to the Industrial Track? I.e., is it about commercial information management software, or about industrial-strength prototypes of information management software in widespread use? |
Yes
|
2 | Originality: How novel is the work described? |
Slightly novel
|
3 | Technical Quality: How complete, deep, and correct is this work? |
Good
|
4 | Significance: How much can this paper teach the community? |
Some; community would benefit from reading
|
5 | Presentation: how readable is the paper? |
Good
|
6 | Overall rating |
Accept
|
7 | Reviewer confidence |
Low
|
8 | Justification for rating (max 3 lines, please) |
The authors present an efficient method for extracting tuples from streaming XML data. The performance results suggests that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art.
|
9 | Detailed comments to authors: |
|
10 | Comments for PC (will not be seen by authors) |
|
11 | Name of external reviewer, if any: |
|
|
Review: 2 |
Reviewer:
| Eric Simon |
Email:
| esimon@businessobjects.com |
Organization:
| Business Objects |
Review:
| |
| Question | Response |
1 | Is this paper relevant to the Industrial Track? I.e., is it about commercial information management software, or about industrial-strength prototypes of information management software in widespread use? |
No
|
2 | Originality: How novel is the work described? |
Slightly novel
|
3 | Technical Quality: How complete, deep, and correct is this work? |
Good
|
4 | Significance: How much can this paper teach the community? |
Some; community would benefit from reading
|
5 | Presentation: how readable is the paper? |
Good
|
6 | Overall rating |
Reject
|
7 | Reviewer confidence |
Medium
|
8 | Justification for rating (max 3 lines, please) |
This is a good research paper that improves the state of the art over previously published research papers on the topic. However, this paper does not qualify as an industrial paper.
|
9 | Detailed comments to authors: |
I strongly encourage you to submit your paper to the forthcoming VLDB 2008 research track.
|
10 | Comments for PC (will not be seen by authors) |
|
11 | Name of external reviewer, if any: |
|
|
Review: 3 |
Reviewer:
| Dana Florescu |
Email:
| dana.florescu@oracle.com |
Organization:
| Oracle Corporation |
Review:
| Not Available |
|
|